The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: There is an image available but since ALT0 is about a different coin I did not include the image. The image could be used for ALT1 if anyone so desires.
Overall: Annwfwn (talk) 12:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
This is my first DYK review, please let me know if I did it right, 2nd opinion requested. I assume that your QPQ was done, @Bruxton:. Annwfwn (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Annwfwn, thanks for getting into DYK! The article is adequately sourced -- lead sections don't need to have citations, per WP:LEADCITE (they're considered cited by the body). This can be confusing to many newer editors, but you'll have the hang of it next time. Review looks good otherwise. Vaticidalprophet 18:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Vaticidalprophet Thank you for the education! I updated the template to reflect this. Annwfwn (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)