Template:Did you know nominations/Ahibaran
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Mandarax (talk) 18:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
GA status was set by a sockpuppet of the nominator. I'm surprised they didn't create another sock to do the DYK review. This nomination is definitely rejected.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ahibaran
[[File:|120px|Image of Emperor Ahibaran ]]
Image of Emperor Ahibaran
- ... that according to mythology, the city Baran, established by Emperor Ahibaran in ancient India, was the richest and famous at that time. He had laid the foundation of Baran Tower there? Asian Folklore Institute; Society for Asian Folklore; JSTOR (Organization); American Theological Library Association (1972). Asian folklore studies. Asian Folklore Institute. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
Improved to Good Article status by WikiGamee (talk). Self-nominated at 16:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- The sentence starting, "The ancient ruins found at places ..." needs rewriting. It is too closely worded.
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - I don't see the hook in the article
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - Hook needs reworking, copyediting
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
--evrik (talk) 03:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Evrik: Please, see again the article. Problems that you point is now fixed. --Wiki 🎮 Play 09:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: The article was reviewed by Bluue Bell who joined on 3 May 2020 (11 days ago). ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm rejecting this nomination. The original review was based on the status being "GA." Because of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raaj Tilak, the GA review has now been deleted. Please resubmit after this gets a genuine GA review. Thanks. --evrik (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)