- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 03:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 21:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Good to go. Time frame OK (created day of nomination). Length OK (approximately 2600 characters excluding infobox and sources). Hook OK—interesting, under 200 characters and reference checks out (see ). Overall, well-written, well-referenced to reliable scholarly sources, and no evidence of excess close-paraphrasing or copyvio. Voceditenore (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)