The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Overall: Good to go. Philroc(c) 14:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but the article is citing two different lengths for the fish, a "maximum" length of 43 cm and another length of 45 cm. Yoninah (talk) 01:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
@Yoninah: Well spotted! What the source for one of the lengths said was "Reported to reach a length of nearly 18 inches" and there is really not a great difference between 18 inches and 17 inches, especially when you do a conversion into centimetres and round it to a whole number. Anyway, I have removed the second length. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. Restoring tick per Philroc's review. Yoninah (talk) 12:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)