Template:Did you know nominations/Barbecue sandwich

 The following is an archived discussion of Barbecue sandwich's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2013 (UTC).

Barbecue sandwich

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that chopped pork shoulder barbecue sandwiches (pictured) served with coleslaw atop them are common in Memphis, Tennessee?

• Reviewed: Mars Cheese Castle, see Template:Did you know nominations/Mars Cheese Castle
• Reviewed another: Sikhī Buddha, see Template:Did you know nominations/Sikhī Buddha. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Northamerica1000 (talk). Self nominated at 00:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC).

• Excuse me, but Template:Did you know nominations/Mars Cheese Castle was already reviewed and OKed before NorthAmerica1000 visited it. That doesn't count for QPQ. --Orlady (talk) 05:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

• I've seen some DYK's that have more than one review, so I figured it would be functional, as per how consensus works on Wikipedia. But, since there is an objection about this, I've reviewed another DYK (see above). Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

• Yeah, standard practice is to review an unreviewed nom, or one where a new review is requested, sine the purpose of QPQ is to try and reduce the backlog. Anyway, this article has some nice pictures. Why not add one to the nom? Chamal ^T•C 17:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for the information. Also, I've added an image to this nomination. Cheers, Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

• Looks good. Verified with ref 14 and offline ref AGF. Length and date are fine. No copyvio/close paraphrasing issues to be seen. Image is CC 2.0 and used in the article. Chamal ^T•C 01:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)