Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Bedford Purlieus National Nature Reserve

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Bedford Purlieus National Nature Reserve

[edit]
(
)
  • Comment: worked on at my sandbox during November before pasting it to the existing stub page

5x expanded by RobinLeicester (talk). Self nom at 13:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

  • A great article, well written, more than long enough and well referenced (as far as I can tell). Hook is good as well. Almost passes, but I do have a couple of minor concerns.
Firstly, the line "The irony of the new plantations is that they gave a commercial and strategic purpose, namely to provide local fuel for the mid-20th century iron smelting industry based at Corby. Without that, it seems highly likely the woodland would have been grubbed up altogether", in the Conservation and public access section, contains weasel words ("seems highly likely" - maybe state who said this in the text, along with the citation) and seems editorialised ("The irony of"). Also I think that the area of the SSSI should be stated in the body text (and referenced) as it is a hook stat. Additionally you don't need references in the lead section if those summarised statements are made later in the body text, as per WP:MOSLEAD (but this isn't a problem for DYK, just a tip).
Get these sorted at it will pass well. Cheers, Zangar (talk) 11:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks for review. I have tried a re-working of the Conservation text, using a direct quote from Peterken, which I hope will improve it. Also, added area to NNR section and moved all lead refs to main body. RobinLeicester (talk) 01:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
  • All concerns fixed, DYK is good to go. A great example of an SSSI artcle! Zangar (talk) 04:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Bedford_Purlieus_National_Nature_Reserve&oldid=1021591261"