Template:Did you know nominations/Capella Cracoviensis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Capella Cracoviensis's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 16:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

Capella Cracoviensis[edit]

Kraków Philharmonic Hall, home base for the Orchestra

  • ... that the Capella Cracoviensis (concert hall pictured) experienced music revival when it switched to old instruments in a 2011 controversy?

Created by Poeticbent (talk). Self nom at 17:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg New enough, long enough. Hook is properly sourced with an inline citation. As no plagiarism or copyvio concerns, it is good to go. --LlamaAl (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg the hook is very difficult to parse — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Crisco. I'm sure, we can work out something. Please take a look at the ALTs (below). I added a bit more info and a couple of new citations. Poeticbent talk 18:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
  • ALT1 ... senior musicians dismissed from Capella Cracoviensis (concert hall pictured) refused to switch to old instruments?
  • ALT2 ... that Capella Cracoviensis (concert hall pictured) received a record amount of financial sponsorship in local music scene for a free festival?
  • ALT3 ... that Capella Cracoviensis (concert hall pictured) received enthusiastic reviews from the critics by switching to old instruments?
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg ALT3 is good, tick based on previous review. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:04, 15 February 2013 (UTC)