Template:Did you know nominations/Chequers Ring

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Chequers Ring[edit]

(

)

[[File:|120x133px|Chequers Ring ]]

Chequers Ring

... that a secret compartment of Queen Elizabeth I's Chequers Ring (pictured) contains miniature portraits of the Queen and a mysterious woman? Source: [1]

Reviewed: Zatania electra

Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 21:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC).

Article was created within the last seven days, is over the required length and has no copyvio concerns. It is well written and referenced, the hook is interesting, the image seems suitably licensed and the user has supplied a QPQ review. My only concern is the wording of the hook, mysterious seems to imply that no-one knows who it is, where as the article states it's a choice of two. Perhaps unknown or "woman who's identity is disputed" if that's not too wordy. What's your thoughts? Kosack (talk) 12:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The article was a bit misleading; I wrote "the other possibility", while the source says "one possible explanation". I think "mysterious" should work either way, since it is true that no-one knows who it is. Catherine Parr and Anne Boleyn are both just assumptions based on circumstantial evidence. Surtsicna (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Ah I see, I was indeed reading it as a definite choice rather than a possibility. In that case, this is good to go. Kosack (talk) 06:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

I agree with Kosack; the other woman is not mysterious, just unknown. Yoninah (talk) 00:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)