Template:Did you know nominations/Dragos Gemelos
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Dragos Gemelos
... that the Dragos Gemelos are two dragon trees named after twin brothers who dueled for the love of a woman? Source: [1] (in Spanish)
- ALT1: ... that the Dragos Gemelos are two entwined dragon trees said to represent twin brothers who dueled for the love of a woman? Source: [2] (in Spanish)
- Reviewed:
QPQ to comeTemplate:Did you know nominations/Gottfried Hornik
Created by Mike Peel (talk). Self-nominated at 21:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC).
- Hello Mike Peel--quick comment: the ISBN for the guidebook, La Palma, seems to be incorrect, and without any further bibliographical information it's pretty much impossible to find it, even adding "Urente". Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Thanks for the nudge, the ISBN on the back of the book was wrong, but I found the correct one inside it. Now fixed in the article. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Mike Peel, thanks--I see that. I would like to ask you to for a bit more sourcing. We have one tourist guide and one (Spanish) website, so that's not exceedingly strong for a front page article. I did a quick search and Google News showed a few more sites, not necessarily much better, but more is always better, plus a few English-language tourist guides. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm seeing what I can do. Note that some of the Google references are about a different pair of trees, e.g., [3]. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: OK, more references added, although they didn't add too much more content. I'm struggling to find more - while clearly notable, it's not well documented online, and I can't easily access offline Spanish sources. Interested in doing a full review? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Much better, Mike Peel, thanks. [Long enough, new enough, interesting enough, no plagiarism that I can see, image properly licensed, etc.) One thing, though (besides the QPQ): I need you to do a minor tweak to that hook, "said to be named" or something like that. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Mike Peel, thanks--I see that. I would like to ask you to for a bit more sourcing. We have one tourist guide and one (Spanish) website, so that's not exceedingly strong for a front page article. I did a quick search and Google News showed a few more sites, not necessarily much better, but more is always better, plus a few English-language tourist guides. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Thanks for the nudge, the ISBN on the back of the book was wrong, but I found the correct one inside it. Now fixed in the article. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Drmies (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)