Template:Did you know nominations/Execution of Majidreza Rahnavard
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Execution of Majidreza Rahnavard
- ... that Majidreza Rahnavard was the first Iranian executed in public stemming from the Mahsa Amini protests? Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-63939428
- Reviewed:
Created by Afddiary (talk). Nominated by Fad Ariff (talk) at 13:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- see comments - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - see comments
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - see comments
- Interesting:
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
@Fad Ariff: Good article. However, three things. 1. citation 22 should have a better ref than a twitter post. 2. Earwig is reporting that there may be a copyvio. I would like elaboration on that. 3. While I could probably infer this, I want a source that explictly states that it was the first public execution. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Thank you! 1. Ok, I will fix this. 2. I'll check this too. 3. Source that explictly state thats it was the first public execution [1]. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I couldn't find a replacement to the twitter citation, so I removed that material. About the copy-vio, I could not find the problem. Which content is a copy-vio? Fad Ariff (talk) 13:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Fad Ariff: If you check earwig (check the DYK toolbox) you can find that it reports that some materials of the article seems to be copied from Goftar news. Now, this could be a case of WP:MIRROR but I would need some evidence to support that. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I think I've fixed everything now. Could you please check? Thank you.Fad Ariff (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
I do think it's good now so approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Great! Do I need to do anything else here? what happens now? Fad Ariff (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Fad Ariff: You just have to wait until this either gets promoted or if someone else finds a problem with it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
The hook isn't cited in the article. SL93 (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Fad Ariff: You just have to wait until this either gets promoted or if someone else finds a problem with it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Great! Do I need to do anything else here? what happens now? Fad Ariff (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I think I've fixed everything now. Could you please check? Thank you.Fad Ariff (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Fad Ariff: If you check earwig (check the DYK toolbox) you can find that it reports that some materials of the article seems to be copied from Goftar news. Now, this could be a case of WP:MIRROR but I would need some evidence to support that. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I couldn't find a replacement to the twitter citation, so I removed that material. About the copy-vio, I could not find the problem. Which content is a copy-vio? Fad Ariff (talk) 13:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
@Fad Ariff, SL93, and Onegreatjoke: I was going to promote but then I came across a few potential issues: one paragraph which appears in this article appears almost verbatim in our article. I do not know if the article has copied from us or we from them. Also some of this article also appears to be too closely paraphrased. Now it could be that the first is a direct copy of the Wikipedia article, but the second article called out above appears to need attention. Bruxton (talk) 19:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- I will leave this to Onegreatjoke as the reviewer. I only checked for a direct citation. SL93 (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looking closer I think that the second one is not a problem just the question about the paragraph here. Bruxton (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- I did explicitly call out the goftar news problem but approved under the opinion that it might have been a mirror. Though now I'm not so sure. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: @Bruxton: exactly which part of the article needs paraphrasing? Fad Ariff (talk) 13:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Look at this and read the above comments to see why it is an issue. Bruxton (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: @Bruxton: @SL93: I have fixed the issues now. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Look at this and read the above comments to see why it is an issue. Bruxton (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: @Bruxton: exactly which part of the article needs paraphrasing? Fad Ariff (talk) 13:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- I did explicitly call out the goftar news problem but approved under the opinion that it might have been a mirror. Though now I'm not so sure. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looking closer I think that the second one is not a problem just the question about the paragraph here. Bruxton (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
moving the tick to the bottom after issues have been resolved. Bruxton (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
