Template:Did you know nominations/Exposición Nacional de Minería (1883), Palacio de Velázquez, Ricardo Velázquez Bosco, Daniel Zuloaga

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Exposición Nacional de Minería (1883), Palacio de Velázquez, Ricardo Velázquez Bosco, Daniel Zuloaga

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

• Exposición Nacional de Minería (1883)
• Palacio de Velázquez
• Ricardo Velázquez Bosco
• Daniel Zuloaga

)

• ... that the Palacio de Velázquez (pictured an archway of the palace) by Ricardo Velázquez Bosco was built for the 1883 Exposición Nacional de Minería, with tiles by Daniel Zuloaga?

• Reviewed: Will do soon.

Created/expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 04:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

• I missed the deadline. If unacceptable, I understand. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

• I have added a picture of the archway in the palace. --Nvvchar. 19:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

• You missed the deadline, but I think that it would be OK if we finish this nomination soon. But the QPQ needs to be done. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

• Review1: Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:09, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
• Review2: Holy Rosary Cathedral (Vancouver) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
• Review3: iRevolution: Online Warriors of the Arab Spring.--Nvvchar. 03:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
• Review4: New Labour, New Danger.--Nvvchar. 03:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

• Reviewer needed for a four-article hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

•  In progress --Mentoz86 (talk) 06:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

• All four articles are new enough, long enough and have inline citation. The hook-fact is supported by a source in all four articles. Good to go. --Mentoz86 (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)