Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Hemant Mehta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Hemant Mehta

[edit]

Expanded from redirect by Frederick Green (talk), PapaSmirk (talk). Nominated by PapaSmirk (talk) at 15:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, from redirect to full article on 3 March 2014, same day as nominated.Green tickY
  • Article is long enough. Over 5k characters, over 900 words now.Green tickY
  • In reviewing history and references, noted article was cut-and-paste moved.
    • Holding until history merge is completed to avoid creating more work for an admin.
    • Merge completed by Anthony Appleyard (talk). Thanks for the quick work!
  • Neutral, in-line citations. Most are reliable sources; some primary or questionable sources cited for minor details, well within policy and guidelines. Hook has an appropriate citation to a reliable source.Green tickY
  • No close paraphrasing, copyvio or plagiarism problem found (Checked 7 blocks of text with Google, scanned 15 ref's available on-line)Green tickY
  • Hook is accurate, short enough (<158 characters), properly formatted and supported by an in-line citation to a reliable source.Green tickY
Suggesting alternate hook. That Hehtal is a HS math teacher isn't particularly interesting or hooky. That the atheist activist raised funds to help a church is ironic and hooky. Since I suggested the alternate hook, I can't approve my own hook. Leaving this for another reviewer to close. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) Join WER 16:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed to finish the review, especially ALT1 hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • This article conforms to the DYK criteria as mentioned above. The ALT1 hook is well-referenced. Good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)