Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Dunker
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Henry Dunker[edit]
- ... that Henry Dunker (pictured) willed his fortune to the Henry and Gerda Dunker donation fund which subsequently funded many improvements to the city of Helsingborg?
- Reviewed:V.P. Ramakrishna Pillai
Created by BabbaQ (talk), GoingBatty (talk), Dwpaul (talk), and Werldwayd (talk, Victuallers (talk). Nominated by BabbaQ (talk) at 16:25, 14 June 2014 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, and compliant with policy (no copyvio by direct translation detected). Source [8] appears to be a wiki and may not be reliable, so I changed the hook fact to be sourced by [2] (which was already used to source it in the lead, just not the body). Hook has thus been verified by a RS citation. Picture is free and looks good at 100px. If you don't mind, I suggest the following tweak to the blurb to get richest man fact in:
- ALT1: * ... that Sweden's richest man, Henry Dunker (pictured), willed his entire fortune a foundation which subsequently funded many improvements to the city of Helsingborg?
- --ThaddeusB (talk)
- Looks great. Thanks!--BabbaQ (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- with preference for ALT1. (I know I "wrote" it, but it is only a slight tweak of the suggested blurb so I think requiring a 3rd party to re-checkmark it is unnecessary bureaucracy.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: I confirm that ALT1 is acceptable and short enough, and that it is sourced in Swedish-language citation #2 which is accepted AGF. (I do not think it is necessary to repeat the rest of the review which I take on trust).--Storye book (talk) 06:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Looks great. Thanks!--BabbaQ (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
