The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Good article. Straightforward and to the point. Had fun reading it. jp×g 18:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
The source says, "Withrow, apparently without consulting anyone, announced that there would be a permanent exhibition in Toronto the next year." Apparently isn't the same thing as for sure. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
ALT0a: ...that John Jacob Withrow(pictured) allegedly did not consult anyone before announcing a permanent exhibition in Toronto?
@JPxG and SL93: would ALT0a be a more accurate hook? Z1720 (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
It's probably best for JPxG to give their opinion on it so that I can promote the hook. SL93 (talk) 02:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
It looks totally fine to me. jp×g 02:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Restoring approval. SL93 (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Good article. Straightforward and to the point. Had fun reading it. jp×g 18:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
The source says, "Withrow, apparently without consulting anyone, announced that there would be a permanent exhibition in Toronto the next year." Apparently isn't the same thing as for sure. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)