Template:Did you know nominations/Logo of PetroChina
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Alex ShihTalk 18:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Logo of PetroChina[edit]
- ... that the current PetroChina logo was adopted in 2004?
Created by QatarStarsLeague (talk). Self nominated at 03:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC).
The article is new enough (created on 30 July) but only barely long enough (currently a mere 1552 characters). At first glance, I do not think that the subject warrants a separate article, the content could well be merged into PetroChina instead. Then, I see POV issues: The whole article is based on self-published sources, with a major part being composed of word-by-word quotations. To me, this looks like an attempt of main page advertising.--FoxyOrange (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- I can assure you that is not the case. You must assume likewise, in adherence to WP:GF. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Indeed, the last part of my statement was unprofessional. Sorry for that.--FoxyOrange (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- I can assure you that is not the case. You must assume likewise, in adherence to WP:GF. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
The article has a merge tag and has an advertisement tag on it. Notability is a concern because the entire article is sourced to the company's website. SL93 (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)