Template:Did you know nominations/New Jersey's 1927 biannual elections proposal

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

New Jersey's 1927 biannual elections proposal

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that because of a mistake in a proposed state constitutional amendment, the New Jersey Legislature defined biannually to mean biennially? Source: several
  • Reviewed: to come

Improved to Good Article status by Wehwalt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 20:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC).

•  Reviewing... Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Gerda Arendt: Great article! Though just a mention but you aren't allowed to put links to other websites (such as wikitionary) in your hooks. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

• @Onegreatjoke: actually, under WP:DYKSG#E4, there's no reason Gerda shouldn't be allowed to use a Wiktionary link. If you want to try and change this, though, you're more than welcome to :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)