Template:Did you know nominations/Pachycondyla? messeliana

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 11:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Pachycondyla? messeliana[edit]

(

)

P.? messeliana fossil

... that the fossil ant Pachycondyla? messeliana (pictured) was only tentatively placed into the genus Pachycondyla due to the conditions of preservation?

Reviewed: Oriole blackbird

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 03:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC).

Article is less than a week old and meets length requirement. Hook is supported by the entire fourth paragraph which is appropriately sourced to a scholarly journal. Let's roll! LavaBaron (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)