Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Sound Transit 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Sound Transit 3

[edit]
(
)
  • Reviewed: Tumbaka people
  • Comment: I may have run into neutrality and/or conflict of interest issues while developing this article, but I believe I've acted in line with guidelines. I have no financial ties to the "yes" campaign, though I do volunteer for them in non-media activities. Please feel free to bring up any issues, since I want this to be done right.

Moved to mainspace by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 20:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • ✓ This article is new and was created on 07:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 16394 characters
    • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (8.3% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Article's age and length are good and its sources look to be fine. QPQ is done. I don't know if either the hook or ALT1 are all that interesting to a broad audience. Perhaps if you mentioned that 62 miles of track would double the amount currently in use if constructed? I do think that the tone is not sufficiently biased in either direction to constitute a neutrality problem, but this is also my first review of a DYK and another, more experience, person would be in a better position to address that concern. I'd say spice up the hook a bit and it should be good to go from there. GrinandGregBearit (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
    • How about this for a spicier hook? " ... that Sound Transit 3 would nearly double the amount of light rail in the Seattle region, to 112 miles (180 km) of track? " SounderBruce 23:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
      • @SounderBruce: I think that would work. With that as the hook I've changed my question mark to a check. As far as pulling and re-nominating after the result goes, I'll check off on it again should you choose to do that but I think the only real change that should have on the nomination would be the verb tense/choice in your hook (and of course throughout the article), right? I guess I just wonder if that is worth potentially delaying the DYK. GrinandGregBearit (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
    • @GrinandGregBearit: I should note that since the ballot measure is subject to approval/rejection on Tuesday, November 8, I might pull the nomination and re-nominate with the result in. SounderBruce 00:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
@SounderBruce: Can you update the article, including the lead, to reflect the fact that the system has been approved? Then the hook can be promoted. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
@Cwmhiraeth: The article and lead have been updated. SounderBruce 06:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Sound_Transit_3&oldid=1037983915"