Template:Did you know nominations/Sugarloaf Creek
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 08:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Sugarloaf Creek
[edit]- ... that the entire length of Sugarloaf Creek is within 300 metres (980 ft) of a road?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 18:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC).
- @Jakec: Length, date verified. No apparent close paraphrasing. Interesting hook and its length is fine. QPQ done. I couldn't verify the hook as it lacks an inline citation. Please ping me when this is resolved so I can finish up the review. (Additional comments: I'm not sure that the air temperature at 11:35 A.M. on July 11, 1997 is relevant or the 1990 population density, but I do understand that, albeit their age, these are additional facts. If you think they're worth keeping, keep them; otherwise, remove.) --Rosiestep (talk) 03:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep: I've added the citation (it was already cited at the end of the paragraph, but I've copied the ref to the end of the sentence as well). The air temperature and water temperature are relevant facts, but they're useless without explaining the time of day and time of year. Hence the dates. Population density is also (in my opinion) an interesting statistic, and 1990 is the only year there's a sourced population density for. --Jakob (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)