Template:Did you know nominations/Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour

Created by InfiniteNexus (talk), Ronherry (talk), and Ticklekeys (talk). Nominated by Shuipzv3 (talk) at 13:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - maybeeeee
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral and plagiarism-free. Hook is cited; it's mildly interesting, but I feel like there's plenty of potential for something more interesting. Maybe mentioning that it beat a record set by No Way Home (a huge film) or that it caused The Exorcist: Believer (another huge film) to move its release date (off FRIDAY THE 13TH I might add and it's a horror film, what the hell). QPQ has been done. Pamzeis (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Shuipzv3 (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

  • Welp, I couldn't miss a chance to review this, could I? I almost nominated this myself lol. I'm fine with all three alt hooks, with preference for Hook 3/ALT3. Though the article doesn't mention the 13th of Oct being a Friday, I feel like it's still reasonable to include it in the hook (since it's a really easy WP:CALC) and it makes it more interesting (IMO), so... WP:IAR, I guess. If any editor disagrees, feel free to but in! Pamzeis (talk) 15:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
    I like the third one the most as well! And yes, including "Friday" in the hook would make it more interesting. ℛonherry 03:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Note that, per my comments at BLPN and the high density of/malaise around Swift articles on the main page in the past few months, this should wait for some time before being promoted. Vaticidalprophet 17:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment: I read the archived discussion on WP:BLPN and I find the alt-right argument to be bizarre and irrelevant. While there may be people in the alt-right who put Swift on a pedestal, Swift has made it clear she does not accept them. She called white supremacy "repulsive". Her endorsement of a Democrat in the 2018 midterm elections drew ire from the alt-right, who felt she "betrayed" them. More recently, her call for voter registrations has again caused a backlash from right-wing commentators, up to the point of death threats. Swift does not speak for or promote the alt-right.
As for the popularity argument, that comes with being one of the most popular artists in the world, which results in many editors. I think the same can be said about say, Beyoncé or Kanye West, and there exists a comparable number of DYKs and FAs related to them. I am aware that having Swift on the front page may look like promotion. In fact, I had thought about asking for this DYK to be used on October 6 or October 13 to coincide with the hook, but erred on the side of caution after reading WP:DYKSO. For what it's worth, I have no ties to Taylor Swift or any of her associates or companies; I work on Swift-related articles as a hobby because I am a fan of her craft. I don't necessarily object to spacing out Swift-related DYKs or FAs if they are too frequent, but I reject the alt-right argument as outlined above. If someone can point me to official or unofficial guidelines on spacing out the frequency of a topic on the front page, I am interested in reading it for future reference. Shuipzv3 (talk) 10:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)