Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Polk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of Thomas Polk's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Polk[edit]

Created/expanded by Cdtew (talk). Nominated by LlamaAl (talk) at 16:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment I don't think I can pass this one, since I'm the article's creator, but I approve of it! Thanks Llama, for the help! Cdtew (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Well cited, new article, definitely long enough. Hook length fine. Cite at end of the paragraph does cover the statement. Was able to check all but the Johnson cite, but since that doesn't apply to the DYK? statement, I don't think that matters here. Doesn't appear to be any real close paraphrasing. Looks good to me. Thank you for your work. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2013 (UTC)