The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amakuru (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Article looks fine, Earwig checks out, no QPQ needed. I'm not familiar with the source for the hook fact, but I'll trust you that it's reliable for this claim. If others disagree, the hook can always be modified to say "according to the Competitive Programming Hall of Fame" or something similar. I'll correct a few minor grammatical errors I spotted in the article. —Mx. Granger (talk·contribs) 18:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
To queue 6. — Amakuru (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Article looks fine, Earwig checks out, no QPQ needed. I'm not familiar with the source for the hook fact, but I'll trust you that it's reliable for this claim. If others disagree, the hook can always be modified to say "according to the Competitive Programming Hall of Fame" or something similar. I'll correct a few minor grammatical errors I spotted in the article. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)