- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Created by Freikorp (talk). Self nominated at 00:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough, adequately footnoted, hook fact checks out, QPQ done, and this is a great hook for the final "quirky" slot in a DYK queue. However, the article as I found it didn't have a good citation for the hook fact and I found a bit of close paraphrasing of the Guardian article. I did some rewording and added some additional footnotes and additional references. At this point, I think everything is good, but someone else needs to do a confirmatory review of my work. --Orlady (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)