Template talk:Circular

Despair

A circular reference is not a reference that goes round in a circle! The rubric must be made clearer. We all know what we mean, it is a reference that ultimately in refers back to itself in a circular manner- but as it stands it sounds lke a reference written on a spinning top, or a merry-go-round. ClemRutter (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RfC of potential interest

An RfC is underway that could affect this template and may therefor be of interest to watchers of this page. The discussion is located at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle#RfC regarding Twinkle maintenance tags that recommend the inclusion of additional sources. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missing documentation

I've added an {{undocumented}} tag to the documentation for this template because the template takes talk= and section parameters that are not described in the documentation. Their effect and intended usage is not clear. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mikeblas, thanks for that. Updated the doc and removed the tag, please see what you think, and restore it if it still needs it. Fyi, section is a parameter value (of positional/unnamed parameter 1), not a parameter. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woot! Thanks! Looks much better! -- mikeblas (talk) 02:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]