Template talk:Country data Saskatchewan

Template:Country data Saskatchewan is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Canada: Saskatchewan / Governments / History

	Canada portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This template is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This template is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.

Heraldry and vexillology

Template:Country data Saskatchewan is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Hypothetical flag[edit]

Is there any support for keeping the hypothetical flag on this template? There is no mention of any real usage at Flag of Saskatchewan. 117Avenue (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove the hypothetical flag, which has no evidence of its existence, and add the 1868, 1921, and 1957 Canada flags, as well as the 1965 Saskatchewan flag by replacing the template syntax with the following:

{{ {{{1<noinclude>|country showdata</noinclude>}}}
| alias = Saskatchewan
| flag alias = Flag of Saskatchewan.svg
| flag alias-1905 = Flag of Canada-1868-Red.svg
| flag alias-1921 = Flag of Canada 1921.svg
| flag alias-1957 = Canadian Red Ensign.svg
| flag alias-1965 = Saskatchewan 60th Anniversary Flag.svg
| size = {{{size|}}}
| name = {{{name|}}}
| variant = {{{variant|}}}
<noinclude>
| var1 = 1905
| var2 = 1921
| var3 = 1957
| var4 = 1965
</noinclude>
}}

Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. JohnCD (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed files[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace File:Flag of Canada-1868-Red.svg with File:Canadian Red Ensign 1868-1921.svg, and File:Flag of Canada 1921.svg with File:Canadian Red Ensign 1921-1957.svg. They were both renamed on Commons. Fry1989 ^eh? 00:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: I did the first but not the second, because the second does not appear to have been renamed on commons - it's still there as commons:File:Flag of Canada 1921.svg I notice that this differs from File:Canadian Red Ensign 1921-1957.svg in that the harps (for Ireland) are very different. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The original file was renamed by myself, however there has been problems with redirects not working, so a user from the German Wikipedia re-uploaded several of the files I renamed back under the old names. We are working on replacements so that the German user's duplicate uploads can be deleted, and this one requires an admin because of page protection. The harp differs on the original file because of this discussion, and the changes in the harp were made after this whole mess. The difference in the harp is not a matter of contention or dispute on Commons, this was simply because of the redirects problem. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK,

Done both. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:23, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]