Template talk:Fallout series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconVideo games Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Location[edit]

Consider including location, since we have a meager 2 articles on it. Oh and Super Mutant isn't an organization, its a race. --Voidvector 22:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Switching over to CVG Navigation has removed the group names (Oh well). The logic behind putting them with the Enclave and BoS is that those three are the three main factions in the series. So consider it faction, not organization.--Miguel Cervantes 22:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As for NCR and the Hub, I threw NCR into factions and the Hub into misc.--Miguel Cervantes 22:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Fallout 1 enemy faction is "Master's Army", or "Unity" according to Fallout Wiki. But since there's no grouping now, it makes no difference. --Voidvector 02:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been deleted in the past because it brought nothing constructive to Wikipedia. This has absolutely nothing to do with the Fallout series except in name and a couple of terms used. Replacing those terms would still make the fanfiction cohesive, including the fact that it's a fanfiction, which has no real value. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Fallout series and I request that it should be regularly removed if it is re-added until the page is inevitably deleted again. --75.209.140.130 (talk) 06:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He's back again with his stupid brony fanfic? Jesus Christ. --Niemti (talk) 07:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Vegas should be listed as a main series title[edit]

It's by no means a spin-off, why would it be? It's 100% canon and continues the story of Fallout 1 and 2. A title different from the usual numerical order doesn't make it a spin-off. ComradeUranium (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, drop the fan POV pushing about New Vegas. Numerous secondary reliable sources going back to it's release call it a spin-off. That is what Wikipedia follows, read WP:V, WP:RS and WP:SECONDARY. Here's just three of thousands of reliable source results for New Vegas and spin-off: [1][2][3]. Why does it matter to it's fans? Being a spin-off doesn't reflect poorly on the game at all. -- ferret (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Opinions and wording choices from people writing articles is debatable as a source, and there are other sources stating it as a main game. (Kelis98 (talk) 14:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC))[reply]
Using the "opinions and wording choices" of "people writing articles" as "a source" is literally the basis of Wikipedia. Please read WP:V and WP:RS. -- ferret (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Vegas DLC listed[edit]

If 3 and 4 have their dlc listed then New Vegas should as well, I am unsure why the edit was undone. (Kelis98 (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Because Fallout 3 and 4 have dedicated articles to their DLC, and New Vegas does not. -- ferret (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]