This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In legacy, Liberty's Kids, please omit the word 'miniseries' and leave 'series' (it wasn't a miniseries but a full series). Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure the label in the template should be longer than the actual article name. It's common to shorten the name, but why do it the other way round? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that. But these years are not needed for disambiguation, so why don't we remove them and just use the article titles? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As a template is a map to the site and subject the chronological progression provides a media overview without taking up much extra space. Commonly used on templates. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, but I think it can get too much. For example, can we remove "paternal second cousin", etc. and just have the list of people? Have simplified some in Template:James Madison/sandbox but if you think the current version is better, then I will leave it — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please, take out all of the cousins and the unlinked great-grandfather, bridges too far (cousins rarely used in templates, and if I added them my apologies to the template community), but should keep the descriptors of the rest of the family for easy identification. Thanks for taking the time to look at this, it was odd to be frozen out of the template but I assume some vandalism was brewing at some point. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: Indefinite template-edit protection on a template transcluded only 75 times does not really hit the "highly used" watermark for me, especially when I can see only two instances of vandalism. Would you consider downgrading the protection either to EC or semi? --Izno (talk) 01:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I knocked it down to semi. At the time, we were having a problem with an LTA who knew how to play the autoconfirmed game, so it needed to be more than that and also DENY of them. DMacks (talk) 02:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]