Trials and allegations involving Silvio Berlusconi
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Trials and allegations involving Silvio Berlusconi have been extensive and include abuse of office, defamation, extortion, child sexual abuse, perjury, mafia collusion, false accounting, embezzlement, money laundering, tax fraud, witness tampering, corruption and bribery of police officers, judges and politicians.
- 1 Allegations
- 2 Completed trials
- 2.1 Propaganda Due (P2) trial: False testimony (1989)
- 2.2 Bribery of lawyer David Mills (1999)
- 2.3 External relationship in mafia association
- 2.4 Massacres of 1992–1993
- 2.5 RAI-Fininvest advertising cartel
- 2.6 All Iberian 1 (Illegal financing of a political party in 1997)
- 2.7 Bribery of the Guardia di Finanza (Arces process)
- 2.8 Illegal financing of a political party on All Iberian 1: statute of limitations
- 2.9 Medusa Film company purchase
- 2.10 Bribing a judge on Lodo Mondadori: statute of limitations
- 2.11 False accounting on All Iberian 2: not guilty (law changed)
- 2.12 False accounting on Fininvest Media Group Consolidated: statute of limitations
- 2.13 Embezzlement, tax fraud and false accounting on Macherio estates: 3 acquittals and 1 amnesty extinct crime
- 2.14 False accounting on Lentini affair: not guilty (law changed)
- 2.15 False accounting, embezzlement and tax fraud on Mediaset television and cinema rights: not proven
- 2.16 Violation of antitrust law, money laundering, and tax fraud, through transactions by the Telecinco TV-channel (Spanish case): not proven
- 2.17 Corrupting a judge and false accounting on SME-Ariosto: not guilty
- 2.18 Tax fraud on Telecinco: not guilty
- 2.19 Country flights
- 2.20 Trani Episode
- 2.21 Investigation of Milan
- 2.22 Abuse of office in the Unipol case (2005)
- 3 Convictions
- 4 Ongoing proceedings
- 5 Ongoing investigations
- 6 References
Berlusconi has been tried in Italian courts in several cases. The outcome for six of those cases were politically altered to end with "no conviction", because of laws passed by Berlusconi's parliamentary majority shortening the time limit for prosecution of various offences and making false accounting illegal only if there is a specific damaged party reporting the fact to the authorities. Berlusconi claimed that "this is a manifest judicial persecution, against which I am proud to resist, and the fact that my resistance and sacrifice will give the Italians a more fair and efficient judicial system makes me even more proud", and added that "789 prosecutors and magistrates took an interest in the politician Berlusconi from 1994 to 2006 with the aim of subverting the votes of the Italian people" citing statistics that he said have constituted a "calvary including 577 visits by police, 2,500 court hearings and 174 million euros in lawyers' bills paid by me". Berlusconi has always been able to afford top lawyers and publicists, for example Nicolas Sarkozy was one of his French top defenders. Some of his former prosecutors later joined the parliamentary opposition. Some of his attorneys are also members of parliament.
- The statute of limitations vary from case to case, as it is calculated according to the maximum penalty for the criminal code referred to by the indictment. If proceedings gets delayed due to circumstances not being caused by the court system, the limitation period can be extended up till maximum 25%. In addition, the limitation period can also be extended if the judge conclude presence of "specific aggravating circumstances" due to repeated relapse of committing specific crimes. In rare cases, the limitation period can also be reduced due to extenuating circumstances. "If the application of the statute of limitations due to terminate shall be a result of the granting of extenuating circumstances, the judgment is characterized by a prior acknowledgment of guilt of the accused and is a source of injury to him."
Propaganda Due (P2) trial: False testimony (1989)
In 1981, a scandal arose after the police discovery of Licio Gelli's secret quasi-Masonic (freemason) lodge Propaganda 2 (P2), which aimed to change the Italian political system to a more authoritarian regime. The list of people involved in P2 included members of the secret services and some prominent characters from political arena, business, military and media. Silvio Berlusconi, who was then just starting to gain popularity as the founder and owner of Canale 5 TV channel, was listed as a member of P2. The P2 lodge was dissolved by the Italian Parliament in December 1981 and a law was passed declaring similar organisations illegal, but no specific crimes were alleged against individual members of the P2 lodge. While the Italian Constitution had forbidden secret associations since 1948, Berlusconi later (in 1989) sued three journalists for libel for writing articles hinting at his involvement in financial crimes. In court, he declared that he had joined the P2 lodge "only for a very short time before the scandal broke" and "he had not even paid the entry fee". Such statements conflicted with the findings of the parliamentary inquiry commission appointed to investigate the lodge's activity, with material evidence, and even with previous testimony of Berlusconi, all of which proved that he had actually been a member of P2 since 1978 and had indeed paid 100,000 Italian liras (approximately equivalent to €300 today) as an entry fee. In 1990, the court of appeal of Venice found Berlusconi guilty of false testimony in front of the Court of Verona, however the court could not pass sentence as the offense had been pardoned by an amnesty passed in 1989.
Some political commentators claim that Berlusconi's electoral programme followed the P2 plan.
Bribery of lawyer David Mills (1999)
David Mills, lawyer husband of the former British cabinet minister Tessa Jowell, acted for Berlusconi in the early 1990s, and was later accused by Italian prosecutors of money laundering and of accepting a gift from Berlusconi in return for witness evidence favourable to Berlusconi given in court. Mills claimed that the money in question came not from Berlusconi but from another client. Tessa Jowell then announced her separation from Mills, which some of the UK media suggested was an attempt to distance herself from a potential scandal. She also denied having discussed the money with her husband; Private Eye magazine published a satirical front cover of Jowell with a speech bubble stating: "I have never met my husband". In December 2010, information obtained by the Wikileaks website revealed Mr Berlusconi had become very fond of Ms Jowell, referring to her in private company as 'piccolo puntaspilli' (the little pincushion).
On 17 February 2009, Mills was found guilty of accepting a bribe of about 400,000 pounds sterling, allegedly from Silvio Berlusconi, and was sentenced to four-and-a-half years in prison. On 25 February 2010, the Court of Cassation gave a verdict towards David Mills of not guilty because the statute of limitations expired. The appeals court ruled on 25 February 2012, in a separate case against Silvio Berlusconi, that the crime should be dated on the exact day when the bribery transfer took place in November 1999, and not at the time of the counter service delivered in 2000, as prosecutors had previously argued, and on that ground Berlusconi was also awarded a Statute of limitation acquittal.
External relationship in mafia association
The Court of Palermo investigated Silvio Berlusconi and his associate Marcello Dell'Utri, on the charge of external partnership with Mafia associations and money laundering. Nine years later the trial ended with a sentence of 9 years imposed on Marcello Dell'Utri and the acquittal of Silvio Berlusconi.
Massacres of 1992–1993
The Court of Florence and Caltanissetta investigated Silvio Berlusconi's connection with the Sicilian Mafia. He was accused of connections with the people responsible for the massacres of 1992 (Capaci and via D'Amelio) where two prosecuting magistrates, involved in the Mafia trial known as "Maxi-processo" of the 1980s, Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino were brutally murdered. The case was archived due to insufficient amounts of evidence found at the expiry of the investigative deadline.
RAI-Fininvest advertising cartel
Berlusconi was through his status as upcoming Prime Minister accused of extortion towards RAI in September 1993, in the attempt of convincing them to sign a cartel agreement on the advertising shares between RAI and the Fininvest TV networks (45% each), for achievement of softer competition and higher prices. The prosecutors investigation was launched in August 1994. The proposed agreement was never signed, because of being rejected by RAI. Through interrogation of Claudio Dematte (former RAI president), Gianni Locatelli (former RAI general manager), and Paolo Murialdi (former RAI administration director), it became clear that Locatelli had received oral "threats" from Berlusconi in September 1993, that if RAI rejected the proposed deal, then it would automatically also remove political goodwill by Berlusconi's political party to ever support potential future recurrence of any RAI saving decrees. The preliminary hearing judge ruled in April 1995 for the case to be archived, due to insufficient amounts of evidence to proof extortion or incitement to corruption.
All Iberian 1 (Illegal financing of a political party in 1997)
Conviction set aside because the statute of limitations expired before Berlusconi exhausted all appeals.
Bribery of the Guardia di Finanza (Arces process)
Silvio Berlusconi (owner of Fininvest) was accused of complicity in corruption. The crime was perpetrated by Fininvest's payment of 380 million lira in bribes to three officers of the Guardia di Finanza engaged in tax audits, in the attempt of convincing them to "turn a blind eye" against tax frauds committed by the four Fininvest owned companies (all with headquarters in Milan): Videotime (1989), Arnoldo Mondadori Editore (1991), Mediolanum (1992) and TELE+ (1994). The mix of interrogation by Paolo Berlusconi and Salvatore Sciascia (the former head of the tax office of Fininvest) made it clear, that the most important decisions were made by Silvio Berlusconi, who was aware of everything, and that sometimes the responsibility of managers were only a facade, because everything was decided by a very small group of people. Silvio Berlusconi was interrogated about his role in the case by the Milan prosecutor Antonio Di Pietro on 22 November 1994. An official indictment was launched against Silvio Berlusconi on 14 October 1995.
- Court rulings
- First-instance Court (July 1998): sentenced Silvio Berlusconi to 2 years and 9 months imprisonment, for all four bribes.
- Court of Appeals (May 2000): For Silvio Berlusconi, the statute of limitations expired for the first three cases, and an acquittal was given on the fourth case, because the court gave him the benefit of the doubt (not proven). According to Italian law, the "statute of limitations" does not imply innocence but acquits the accused from any further legal proceeding; it may in fact indicate guilt if the statute of limitations is applied after conceding benefits for previous good conduct, since such benefits can only be granted after guilt is ascertained, as per Corte di Cassazione, Sect. IV, Sentence no. 5069, 21 May 1996.
- Court of Cassation (October 2001): full acquittal for Silvio Berlusconi in all 4 cases. The other accused in the case were judged to:
- Paolo Berlusconi: full acquittal.
- Alfredo Zuccotti (former managing director of Fininvest): 1 year and 4 months imprisonment.
- Salvatore Sciascia (the former head of the tax office of Fininvest): 2 years and 6 months imprisonment.
- Massimo Maria Berruti (the legal advisor to the group Segrate): 10 months imprisonment.
- Vincenzo Tripodi (colonel of Guardia di Finanza): full acquittal.
- Giovanni Arces (officer of Guardia di Finanza): 2 years imprisonment.
- Angelo Capone (officer of Guardia di Finanza): 3 years imprisonment.
- Francesco Nanocchio (officer of Guardia di Finanza): 2 years and 2 months imprisonment.
In April 2010, the supreme court noted through the published motivations of its ruling in the Bribery of lawyer David Mills to commit perjury case, that his false testimony had resulted in an incorrect acquittal for the charges against Silvio Berlusconi in the Arces process. But when considering the statute of limitations now apply for all four charges in the case, the judicial system did not find it appropriate to reopen the case.
Illegal financing of a political party on All Iberian 1: statute of limitations
Court of First Instance: sentenced to jail (2 years and 4 months) for paying 21 billion lire (about 10 million euro) to Bettino Craxi via an offshore bank account codenamed "All Iberian".
Court of Appeal: the statute of limitations expired before the appeal was completed so Silvio Berlusconi was acquitted.
Medusa Film company purchase
In October 1995, Berlusconi received a "notice of investigation" from the prosecutor Margherita Taddei, on charges of false accounting and embezzlement connected to the purchase by Reteitalia (a subsidiary of Fininvest and the holding company of Canale 5) of the company Medusa Film, back in 1988. According to the financial statements of Reteitalia the purchase had cost 28bn lira, but according to the owners of Medusa Film they only received 18bn lira for the sale. The difference on 10bn lira (equal to €5.2 million) had been silently transferred by Reteitalia in monthly tranches of 100 or 200 million lira at a time into five private bank accounts owned by Silvio Berlusconi. The initial response of Berlusconi, which came during a TV broadcast on 5 October 1995, was to say: "It' s absurd accusing me of embezzlement, since I own one hundred percent of Reteitalia". The prosecutor replied, that in Italy its a crime to make hidden (not accounted for) payments to shareholders. Subsequently Berlusconi declined to show up for interrogations with the prosecutor, referring to that he knew nothing about the money transfers to his five private bank accounts, and claimed it was so small amounts that he never himself had noticed/questioned why these extra amounts had been transferred. The prosecutor then instead interrogated four other business people from Reteitalia, and in November 1995 filed an indictment request for all five persons (including Silvio Berlusconi) for having committed false accounting and embezzlement. If the embezzlement charges would be proven by the court, this part of guilt would however be granted impunity due to a 1988 amnesty for the crime.
- Court rulings
- First-instance court: 1 year and 4 months imprisonment for Silvio Berlusconi.
- Court of Appeals (February 2000): Full acquittal, since he was considered being too rich to be aware of such small amounts.a The four other Reteitalia managers charged in the case received: Adriano Galliani (acquittal), Livio Gironi (acquittal), Giancarlo Foscale (acquittal), and Carlo Bernasconi (conviction confirmed).
- Court of Cassation (October 2001): Full acquittal, since he was considered being too rich to be aware of such small amounts.a To be exact, the court ruled the previous Court of Appeals ruling to be upheld because: "re-examination of the same facts is not admissible to the Supreme Court".
a Among the reasons for full acquittal were: (1) The 10bn transfers to Silvio's bank accounts were made by his father before he died, (2) As Reteitalia is managed independently from Fininvest managers, "one must also exclude a knowledge of the ex-post' enrichment and its causal" by Berlusconi, because it "would require the visibility of the 'increase of more than 10bn even after some months of using the bank accounts.", (3) But this visibility "is contradicted by reality," since "the multiplicity of bank accounts belonging to the family Berlusconi, the pulverization of the sum into five bank accounts and other large well-known heritage of Silvio Berlusconi in which the sums were widely divided to flow, postulate the impossibility of knowledge of both the extra saldo increases and especially the origin of the same.", (4) Without "knowledge and acceptance of the causal", there can be no "involvement of the defendant for the act of preparation false corporate communications.".
Bribing a judge on Lodo Mondadori: statute of limitations
First Court: A Prima facie case was issued, but the magistrate decided to drop the charges. The state attorney refused to file the case and appealed against the ruling.
Appeal Court: statute of limitations expired before the appeal was completed so Silvio Berlusconi was acquitted.
False accounting on All Iberian 2: not guilty (law changed)
First Court: On 26 September 2005, Berlusconi was acquitted because the new law on false accounting makes false accounting illegal only if there is a specific damaged party reporting the fact to the authorities. This new law was passed by Berlusconi's parliamentary majority after the beginning of the trial, and was claimed by the opposition to be an ad personam law, i.e. aimed at acquitting Berlusconi.
False accounting on Fininvest Media Group Consolidated: statute of limitations
Allegation: 750 million euro of illegal (black market) funds stored by Fininvest in 64 offshore companies. The statute of limitations expired due to the new laws on false accounting approved by Berlusconi's government, therefore an acquittal was given because no specific damaged party reported it to the government.
Embezzlement, tax fraud and false accounting on Macherio estates: 3 acquittals and 1 amnesty extinct crime
First Court: acquitted for embezzlement and tax fraud, the statute of limitations expired before a verdict was reached on the two cases of false accounting.
Appeal Court: acquitted for embezzlement, tax fraud and false accounting for the Idra company; while being guilty on false accounting for the Buonaparte company - a crime he however received amnesty for due to the 1992 fiscal remission law.
False accounting on Lentini affair: not guilty (law changed)
Allegation: 5 million euros paid secretly to Torino football club for buying the player Gianluigi Lentini bringing him to AC Milan.
First court: The statute of limitations expired due to the new laws on false accounting approved by Berlusconi's government, therefore the case was closed with an acquittal on 4 July 2002.
False accounting, embezzlement and tax fraud on Mediaset television and cinema rights: not proven
Silvio Berlusconi was on trial in relation to transactions carried out by the Berlusconi family's media company Mediaset in the 1990s. Prosecutors suspected two offshore firms controlled by a Berlusconi family holding, Fininvest, bought television and cinema rights from a US firm. The companies, it was alleged, then sold the rights on at inflated prices to Mediaset, also controlled by Fininvest, to avoid Italian taxes and create a slush fund. The trial started on 21 November 2006. The court acquitted Berlusconi, giving him the benefit of the doubt (not proven).
Violation of antitrust law, money laundering, and tax fraud, through transactions by the Telecinco TV-channel (Spanish case): not proven
In Spain, Silvio Berlusconi, along with other Fininvest managers, was charged with violation of antitrust law, money laundering, and tax fraud for 100bn lira, for the TV-channel Telecinco he founded. The trial was suspended from 1999 to 2006 due to the immunity enjoyed by Berlusconi from being a leader of a foreign government. In April 2006, when Romano Prodi replaced Berlusconi as Italian prime minister, the Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón reopened the court procedure against him. In 2008, the lawyer Niccolo Ghedini announced the Spanish supreme court had ruled a complete acquittal towards Berlusconi and all other previously accused in the case.
Corrupting a judge and false accounting on SME-Ariosto: not guilty
At its outset, the trial SME-Ariosto involved both Cesare Previti and Silvio Berlusconi. Subsequently, a bill was approved by the Italian parliament, the so-called "Lodo Maccanico" act (also known as "Lodo Schifani", after the name of Renato Schifani, the lawyer of Berlusconi and now speaker of the Italian Senate who was also a member of parliament working on the law). This law guaranteed immunity to the five highest officers of the state (premier, president of the Republic, Senate's speaker, Deputy Chamber's speaker, Constitutional Court's president) during their period in office. To avoid complete suspension of the trial, the Court of Milan split it into two parts, one regarding Cesare Previti, the other Silvio Berlusconi. The Cesare Previti part of the trial resulted in a guilty verdict. In the other part (regarding Silvio Berlusconi) the Italian Prime Minister's innocence had still not been proven but the case had to be stopped because of the "Lodo Maccanico"' immunity act. On 16 April 2004, the Constitutional Court declared that the "Lodo Maccanico" violated articles n. 3 and 34 of the Italian Constitution, therefore this immunity act was declared unconstitutional and the trial resumed. After 12 years of trial, Silvio Berlusconi was acquitted on 27 April 2007, because of art.530 comma 2 ("He didn't commit the fact", i.e. full acquittal).
Tax fraud on Telecinco: not guilty
Silvio Berlusconi has been indicted in Spain for charges of tax fraud and violation of anti-trust laws regarding the private TV network Telecinco. All the accused have been acquitted by the Spanish "Corte de Casacion" in July 2008.
On 3 June 2009, Silvio Berlusconi was charged Roman prosecutor Giovanni Ferrara with abuse of office for using government-funded flights for personal use.
Silvio Berlusconi has been signed in the register of suspects, for some telephone interceptions where "he forced the director of a tv channel, to close the tv political program Annozero" as said by the magistrate Michele Ruggiero.
Investigation of Milan
In October 2010, Silvio Berlusconi and his son Piersilvio were investigated in connection with false financial statements.
Abuse of office in the Unipol case (2005)
In February 2012, Milan prosecutors charged Berlusconi with abuse of office in 2005, in connection with the publication of wiretapped conversations in the Italian newspaper Il Giornale, which is owned by Berlusconi's brother Paolo Berlusconi. The publication of the conversations between then Governor of the Bank of Italy Antonio Fazio, senior management of Unipol and Italian centre-left politician Piero Fassino was a breach of secrecy rules and was seen at the time as an attempt to discredit Berlusconi's political rivals. Their publication also eventually led to the collapse of the proposed takeover of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro by Unipol and the resignation of Fazio. The head of the company used by Italian prosecutors to record the conversations has been previously convicted of stealing the recordings and making them available to Berlusconi. On 7 February 2012, at an initial court hearing, Berlusconi denied he had listened to the tapes and ordered their publication. The first-instance ruling was issued 7 March 2013, and sentenced Berlusconi to a year in prison and the joint payment together with his also convicted brother, of 80,000 euro as compensatory damages in favor of Piero Fassino in addition to court litigation costs of €10,000. On 31 March 2014, the Milan Court of Appeal ruled that the evidence did not clear Paolo and Silvio Berlusconi from guilt, but that the facts are now prescribed, which mean they were both acquitted due to the statutes of limitations. Although Paolo still had to pay €80,000 as compensatory damages to Fassino.
Tax Fraud in the Mediaset trial
(A) false accounting and embezzlement in order to mask payments of substantial "black funds", committed in 1988–94.
(B) tax fraud equal in total to more than €62 million (120bn lira), committed in 1988–98.
Both indictments were related to achievement of personal tax evasion, through illicit trade of movie rights between Mediaset and secret fictive foreign companies situated in tax haven nations, causing fictive losses for Mediaset, with the trade gains being accumulated by the foreign companies owned by the indicted tax fraudsters, who ultimately had the gains paid out as personal profit without paying tax in Italy. In 2007, the court case at first-instance had not yet been launched, and the prosecutors dropped the (A) charges against Berlusconi due to the statute of limitations, and for the same reason the (B) charges were narrowed down to the 1994-98 period, in which the prosecutor charged Berlusconi for having committed a personal tax evasion of €7.3 million.
On October 26, 2012 Silvio Berlusconi was convicted of tax fraud in an Italian court and was sentenced to four years' imprisonment. He was also banned from running for public office for a five-year term. The sentence has been confirmed by the Court of Appeals in Milan on May 8, 2013.
The Court of Cassation decided to deal with the appeal to the sentence of the Court of Appeals on July 30 because for some parts of the verdict the statute of limitations would come into force at August 1, 2013. This caused the political party The People of Freedom with support of a part of their coalition partners to suspend the activities of the National Assembly and the Senate for one day. The Court of Cassation confirmed on August 1 the sentence of four years imprisonment (of which the last three years are automatically pardoned), and shortly afterwards the related additional court imposed public office ban was recalculated from five to two years by the Appeals Court; which subsequently also was confirmed on last instance by the Court of Cassation.
On 27 November 2013, the Italian Senate voted to expel Berlusconi from his seat in parliament due to his final court conviction, and bar him from taking any public office for an extended period of six years, based on the Severino law. While the court had already declared Berlusconi unfit for public office, the Italian Senate also had to confirm the expulsion in a full vote, before it took effect. The Senate vote came after Berlusconi no longer commanded enough support in parliament to bring down the government, which had previously been an issue. In its article about the expulsion, Reuters reported that Berlusconi is preparing his media empire to attack the Enrico Letta's coalition government. With his expulsion from Parliament, Berlusconi lost his parliamentary immunity, which can have consequences in other active court cases against Berlusconi. Berlusconi began serving his community service at a catholic care home center on 9 May 2014, where he is required to work four hours a week for a year with elderly dementia patients.
Bribery of senators supporting the Prodi-government (2006)
In February 2013, Silvio Berlusconi is under investigation for corruption and illegal financing of political parties from the public prosecutor of Naples, in the figures of Vincenzo Piscitelli, Henry John Woodcock, Francesco Curcio, Alessandro Milita and Fabrizio Vanorio. He is accused of bribing in 2006, with €3 million (of which 1 million declared and 2 million undeclared to the tax authorities), directed to Senator Sergio De Gregorio (the former leader of the Italians in the World party) to facilitate its passage into the ranks of the Berlusconi led coalition House of Freedoms. Along with Berlusconi, a journalist (Valter Lavitola) at the head of the newspaper Avanti! was also investigated, and Sergio De Gregorio self-confessed being the recipient of the bribery.
On 23 October 2013, Silvio Berlusconi and Valter Lavitola were both indicted by the judge for preliminary hearings, Amelia Primavera. For Senator De Gregorio the process has already been closed in a preliminary hearing, because he opted to self-confess and bargained a reduced sentence of 20 months in prison for the crime. The court hearing at first-instance for the indicted Silvio Berlusconi, has been scheduled to start on 11 February 2014. During the court proceedings, ex-senator Paolo Rossi (a former member of the Olive Tree party) also testified to have been offered a bribe from Berlusconi by another ex-Senator Antonio Tomassini (a former member of the defunct Christian Democrats), to change political sides and join Silvio Berlusconi's center-right bloc, so that they together could cause the fall of the Romano Prodi government in 2006–08. According to the prosecutors, Valter Lavitola was as well working on behalf of Berlusconi as a go-between attempting to also bribe other senators.
When his solicitor, Professor Coppi, “recalled the constitutional basis of the freedom of parliamentary activity, the prosecutor Woodcock reacted indicating the illegality of the transfer of money, which resulted in the sale of senators. The Naples Court ruled in favor of the second” thesis.
On 20th April 2017 the Appeal Court of Naples ruled that, although the accusations against Mr Berlusconi were true, the statute of limitations applied, in other words the case had been "timed out". It is worth noting that in spite of the overwhelming strength of the evidence against him, Mr Berlusconi went unpunished whilst the recipient of the bribe accepted a prison sentence. This was due to Berlusconi's government (in 2011) shortening the time limits for completing a successful prosecution before the statute of limitations kicked in, which allowed his lawyer to play for time. 
Defamation against Antonio Di Pietro (2008)
Berlusconi has repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of the educational degree of the former Operation "Clean Hands" magistrate and leader of the Italy of Values party, Antonio Di Pietro, when he during a 2008 election rally and in an episode of the talk show Porta a Porta in March 2008, repeatedly claimed, that Di Pietro had not obtained his magistrate degree by passing the exams, but with the complicity of the secret services diverted, in order to have a judge placed in the system to overturn the parties of the so-called First Republic. Di Pietro subsequently sued Berlusconi for aggravated defamation in June 2008. The public prosecutor concluded the preliminary investigation 13 November 2009, by indicting Berlusconi for the defamation offense referred to in Article 595 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. The Italian Chamber of Deputies then intervened in the case by passing a decree 22 September 2010, granting all Italian parliamentarians "absolute immunity" for words spoken while elected.
On 5 October 2010, the court in Viterbo considered Berlusconi could not be judged or punished, because of the parliamentarian immunity Article 68 of the Italian constitution forbidding any legal prosecutions against words spoken by parliamentarians in the process of their "exercise of parliamentary duties", in conjunction with the Chamber of Deputies recently having voted for a decree to appoint Berlusconi absolute immunity for any spoken words while serving as a deputy. On 19 January 2012, this judgment was set aside by the Supreme Court, which ruled that Berlusconi had been speaking during a campaign rally and not in an institutional setting; meaning he was not covered by the immunity protection provided for by the constitutions Article 68, and consequently should face a new court trial to be held either at the Viterbo court or the Constitutional Court.
On 10 January 2013, the Viterbo court decided to transfer the case for judgement directly to the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court ruled on 20 June 2013, that the Chamber of Deputies decree having extended Berlusconi's immunity beyond what was provided for by the constitution, was a case with conflict of powers and should be disregarded. This mean that Berlusconi do not enjoy any special immunity protection for his spoken words during election campaigns, and that a court case now shall be held by the constitutional court, to decide the merits of the case. Before the case against Berlusconi can begin, the Italian Chamber of Deputies however shall be called for trial to defend and explain the reasons for passing their unconstitutional law from 2010. The court hearing against the Chamber of Deputies took place on 8 July 2014, where the constitutional court was asked to deem the concerned Chamber of Deputies decree to be unconstitutional and annul it, by the Court of Rome and the Viterbo court. On 18 July 2014, the Constitutional Court indeed ruled the decree to be unconstitutional and annulled it; meaning that the civil court proceedings against Berlusconi now can continue.
Ruby process: Child prostitution and abuse of office (2010)
Silvio Berlusconi was indicted for paying Moroccan nightclub dancer Karima El Mahroug, also known by the stage name Ruby Rubacuori (Italian for "Ruby the Heartstealer"), for sexual services between February and May 2010 when she was one year below the sexual criminal minimum age of 18. He was also indicted for abuse of office, by having arranged to have El Mahroug released from police detention, during an incident in which she was briefly held on claims of theft in May 2010. As evidence for the crimes, the police investigators submitted lawful interceptions of mobile phone conversations. In June 2013, Berlusconi was convicted of the charge and sentenced to seven years imprisonment and a lifetime public office ban, pending an appeal launched to the Appeals Court - and ultimately perhaps also a final appeal launched to the Court of Cassation. In January 2014, Silvio Berlusconi deposited an appeal against the judgment, requesting the complete absolution. The appeal process began on 20 June. On 18 July 2014, the Italian appeals court announced the appeal had been successful and the convictions against Berlusconi were being overturned. According to the court's published summary of the judgement, Berlusconi was acquitted from the extortion charges (abuse of power) because "the fact does not exist" and from the child prostitution charge because "the fact is not a crime". The more detailed court reasoning for acquittal will be published within 90 days, and the prosecutor stated he would then most likely appeal the decision to the Court of Cassation.
In addition to the ongoing court trials, Berlusconi is currently also involved in the following two ongoing legal investigations, which will evolve to become an ongoing court trial if the judge at the preliminary hearing indict him of the alleged crime:
- Ruby ter (2011–13): Corruption in judicial acts (bribing witnesses) in connection with evidence submitted at the main "Ruby case". Allegedly a bribery with €2500 paid per month for each of the 18 Olgettine girls from Arcore (the girls - including Ruby - participating in the evening events at Berlusconi's residents) to speak in favor of Berlusconi, had been started by his two defending lawyers, Niccolò Ghedini and Piero Longo, in the aftermath of the opened police investigation on 15 January 2011. In addition the Mediaset journalist Silvia Trevaini had allegedly been bribed, not only by the same monthly fee but also by extra gifts equal to €800,000. Finally Ruby, in particular, had been promised by Berlusconi "a huge reward if she would keep quiet or otherwise make him mad", and Ruby had replied she was "waiting for €5 million". On 23 January 2014, the public prosecutor Edmondo Bruti Liberati, asked for a legal case to be opened for a preliminary hearing.
- Illegal financing of the political party Italians in the World: On 16 April 2014, the Naples prosecutor deposited new documents in which Berlusconi is under investigation for the crime in recent years of illegal financing of the political party Italians in the World, being led by ex-Senator Sergio De Gregorio. Currently this process is under investigation, with an upcoming preliminary hearing to decide if an court indictment shall be filed.
- "All Iberian, Berlusconi assolto "Falso in bilancio non è più reato"". la Repubblica (in Italian). 26 September 2005. Archived from the original on 11 September 2012.
- "Caso Lentini, reati prescritti". la Repubblica (in Italian). 5 July 2002. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012.
- "Berlusconi-Fini, c'è l'accordo nel Pdl sui tempi dei processi" (in Italian). Lastampa.it. 11 November 2009. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
- Dolasilla (22 February 1999). "Il processo breve arriva al Senato e per i giudici parte la corsa contro il tempo" (in Italian). Loccidentale.it. Archived from the original on 22 July 2011. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
- Stasio, Donatella (11 November 2009). ""Estinti" Mediaset e Mills ma non Mediatrade-Rti" (in Italian). Ilsole24ore.com. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
- "GIUSTIZIA: DI PIETRO, SPIACE FINI SI PRESTI A GIOCO" (in Italian). Repubblica.it. 10 November 2009. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
- Pennello, Franco (10 November 2009). "Berlusconi incensurato? Sì, ma con 7 prescrizioni e 2 amnistie" (in Italian). Ilsalvagente.it. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 2 March 2010.
- "Judges urged to jail Berlusconi". BBC News. 12 November 2004. Archived from the original on 12 July 2012.
- "Berlusconi Counts Cost of Legal Battles". Reuters. 25 June 2008. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012.
- "Italy's Berlusconi wins immunity from prosecution". Reuters. 22 June 2008. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012.
- "Berlusconi : le "bon Nicolas Sarkozy" a été mon avocat". Le Nouvel Observateur (in French). France. 29 June 2009. Archived from the original on 24 May 2012.
- "Corfù, il vertice del disgelo "Riparte collaborazione Nato-Russia"". la Repubblica (in Italian). 27 June 2009. Archived from the original on 24 May 2012.
Il Cavaliere: "Mandai il mio avvocato Sarkozy da lui per la Georgia..."
- "Berlusconi al vertice Nato-Russia "Quando mandai l'avvocato Sarkozy"" (in Italian). L'Unione Sarda. 27 June 2009.
- "I pm: 3 anni e 8 mesi di carcere a Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 19 June 2012.
- "Silvio Berlusconi sentenced for tax fraud". BBC News. 26 October 2012. Archived from the original on 7 February 2014.
- "Process Mediaset TV rights: Berlusconi sentenced to four years on appeal (Tax Fraud: confirmed the first instance judgment, including the disqualification from holding public office for 5 years)" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 8 May 2013. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013.
- "Italian high court upholds Berlusconi's sentence in tax fraud case". CNN. 1 August 2013. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
- "Italy court bans Berlusconi from public office for two years". Reuters. 19 October 2013.
- "Diritti tv, Cassazione conferma 2 anni di interdizione per Silvio Berlusconi" (in Italian). Il Sole 24 ORE. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
- "Disciplina degli illeciti penali e amministrativi riguardanti le societa' commerciali, a norma dell'articolo 11 della legge 3 ottobre 2001, n. 366" (in Italian). 11 April 2002.
- "Processo Sme, Berlusconi assolto "Il falso in bilancio non è più reato"" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 30 January 2008.
- "Sme, la Cassazione assolve Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 27 October 2007.
- "Scandalosa assoluzione di Berlusconi Prodi, Fassino, D'Alema e Bertinotti non commentano. La responsabile dei DS per la giustizia Finocchiaro: "Una buona notizia l'assoluzione del premier" Prescritto il reato di corruzione del giudice Squillante" (in Italian). PMLI. 15 December 2004.
- "Sme, Berlusconi assolto dall' accusa di corruzione" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 28 April 2007.
- "Tangenti alle Fiamme Gialle. Assolto Silvio Berlusconi" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 19 October 2001.
- "Berlusconi è colpevole" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 8 July 1998.
- "Tangenti alle Fiamme Gialle. Berlusconi assolto in appello" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 9 May 2000.
- "Cassazione, Mills fu teste reticente" (in Italian). ANSA. 21 April 2010. Archived from the original on 19 March 2013.
- "Processate Berlusconi per L' affare Medusa" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 23 November 1995.
- "Giustizia. Berlusconi assolto nel processo Medusa" (in Italian). Rainews 24. 9 February 2000. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011.
- "Caso Medusa. La Cassazione assolve definitivamente Berlusconi" (in Italian). Rainews 24. 1 October 2001. Archived from the original on 9 June 2011.
- "Patrimonio ingente, Berlusconi non sapeva" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 11 July 2000.
- "I terreni di Macherio. Chiesti sedici mesi per Silvio Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 22 January 1999.
- "Berlusconi, nuova assoluzione in appello" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 29 October 1999.
- "Frode sui diritti tv, per Berlusconi richiesta di rinvio a giudizio" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 9 April 2010.
- "Caso Mediatrade, prosciolto Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 18 October 2011.
- "Mediatrade,prosciolto Berlusconi,a giudizio P.Silvio, Confalonieri" (in Italian). Reuters. 18 October 2011.
- "Mediatrade, Berlusconi prosciolto. Respinto il ricorso dei pm di Milano" (in Italian). Il Fatto Quotidiano. 18 May 2012.
- "Inchiesta Mediatrade Il pm: Berlusconi a processo per frode" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 17 February 2012.
- "Diritti tv, Berlusconi prescritto e assolto" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 27 June 2012.
- "Mediatrade, prosciolto Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 7 March 2013.
- "Nessuno mi può giudicare" (in Italian). Societacivile.it. 11 December 2004.
- "Berlusconi assolto per il caso Telecinco" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 18 October 2008.
- "Per il Cavaliere un'archiviazione e forse nuova indagine" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 7 April 1995. Archived from the original on 1 November 2013.
- Sentenza Corte di Cassazione n.5069 del 21 maggio 1996, sezione IV.
- "Dal rinvio a giudizio con Mister B. alla prescrizione l'avventuroso processo all'avvocato Mills" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 25 February 2010. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
- "Processo Mills, Silvio Berlusconi prosciolto per prescrizione" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 25 February 2012. Retrieved 25 February 2012.
- "Mills, la lettera-confessione non vale contro Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 15 May 2012. p. 22. Retrieved 19 May 2012.
- "Silvio Berlusconi faces fourth trial on wiretap charges". BBC News. 7 February 2012. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- "Processo Unipol, Silvio Berlusconi condannato a un anno. A Fassino 80mila euro di risarcimento" (in Italian). Il Sole 24 ORE. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original on 7 March 2013. Retrieved 7 March 2013.
- "Unipol, 1 anno a Berlusconi. A Fassino risarcimento da 80mila euro" (in Italian). TM News. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original on 7 March 2013. Retrieved 7 March 2013.
- "Berlusconi sentenced to 1 year jail in wiretap trial". Reuters. Retrieved 7 March 2013.
- "Berlusconi wiretap charge timed out, says court". ANSA. 31 March 2014.
- "Unipol: the regulation saves Silvio Berlusconi from a new judgment". New Europe. 1 April 2014.
- Gomez, Peter; Travaglio, Marco (June 2001). La repubblica delle banane. Rome, Italy: Editori Riuniti. pp. 533–543. ISBN 88-359-4915-7.
- "Compravendita senatori, Berlusconi e Lavitola rinviati a giudizio" (in Italian). ANSA. 23 October 2013. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
- "Compravendita senatori, Berlusconi a processo a Napoli" (in Italian). Agenzia Giornalistica Italia (AGI). 23 October 2013. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
- "Diffamazione Berlusconi-Di Pietro, atti alla Corte Costituzionale" (in Italian). TusciaWeb. 10 January 2013.
- "Consulta: sì a ricorso di Di Pietro contro Berlusconi" (in Italian). L'Unità. 20 June 2013.
- "Reg. conf. poteri n.13 del 2011 pubbl. su G.U. del 29/08/2012 n.34 (Appellant: Court of Rome - Section 1.a civil; Defendant: Chamber of Deputies)" (in Italian). Corte Costituzionale. 29 August 2012.
- "Reg. conf. poteri n.3 del 2013 pubbl. su G.U. del 28/08/2013 n.35 (Appellant: Justice of the Peace of Viterbo, Defendant: Chamber of Deputies)" (in Italian). Corte Costituzionale. 28 August 2013.
- "Public hearing on 8 July 2014 (case 10+11): Video" (in Italian). Corte Costituzionale. 8 July 2014.
- "Sentenza 221/2014 del 09/07/2014" (in Italian). Corte Costituzionale. 18 July 2014.
- "Sentenza 222/2014 del 09/07/2014" (in Italian). Corte Costituzionale. 18 July 2014.
- "The War They Wanted, the Lies They Needed". Vanity Fair. July 2006. Archived from the original on 29 May 2012.
- Proceedings of the parliamentary inquiry commission headed by Tina Anselmi
- "Bettazzi: 'Berlusconi Realizza Il Piano Di Rinascita Della P2'". la Repubblica (in Italian). 10 January 1995. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012.
- "UK lawyer guilty in bribery case". BBC News. 17 February 2009. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 10 October 2009.
- "David Mills bribery conviction quashed by appeals court". BBC. 25 February 2010. Archived from the original on 13 July 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2010.
- "Mills decision a boost for Berlusconi – The Irish Times – Sat, Feb 27, 2010". The Irish Times. 27 February 2010. Archived from the original on 20 September 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
- "'Presidente, l'accusiamo...'" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 23 November 1994.
- "Un passo indietro obbligatorio" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 15 October 1995.
- According to Italian law, the "statute of limitations" does not imply innocence but acquits the accused from any further legal proceeding; it may in fact indicate guilt if the statute of limitations is applied after conceding benefits for previous good conduct, since such benefits can only be granted after guilt is ascertained, as per: Corte di Cassazione, Sect. IV, Sentence no. 5069, 21 May 1996
- "All Iberian, Berlusconi acquitted. "False accounting is not a wrongdoing anymore"". Repubblica.it. Retrieved 11 September 2011.
- (in Italian) http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2002/07/05/caso-lentini-reati-prescritti.html
- Sanderson, Rachel (7 February 2012). "Berlusconi faces another court case". The Financial Times. Milan. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
- "Milano, chiusa l'indagine Mediaset. Berlusconi verso il rinvio a giudizio" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 19 February 2005.
- "Chiesto il rinvio a giudizio per Berlusconi" (in Italian). Corriere della Sera. 27 April 2005.
- "Three reasons Silvio Berlusconi might never see prison". Washington Post. 26 October 2012. Retrieved 26 October 2012.
- "Berlusconi expelled from Italian parliament over tax fraud". Reuters.
- "Berlusconi begins one-year community sentence". BBC. 9 May 2014.
- "The charge is based on a singular reversal of provisions intended to monitor and protect (free) parliamentary activity. Since our Constitution prohibits the imperative mandate to MPs (in essence, the Member may at any time at its discretion to change its political position no risking forfeiture of the mandate given by the voters), the prosecution of the criminal case it has not already felt that you could not configure the corruption (to act contrary to official duties) provided that any official duty exists in the parliamentary leader, but on the contrary argued - and supports - that the very payment of a sum of money has, in fact, led to the rise of a mandatory (prohibited)": see http://www.goleminformazione.it/articoli/immunita-parlamentare-diritto-politico-lo-scudo-di-cartone.html#.VYo0i2AuV6B.
- "Berlusconi indagato a Napoli per compravendita di senatori" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 28 February 2013. Retrieved 28 February 2013.
- "Rossi 'offered bribe' to join Berlusconi". ANSA. 7 May 2014.
- (in Italian) Giustizia: lo scudo di cartone, tra magistrati e parlamentari rapporto sempre più difficile Il Garantista, 12 July 2015.
- "Compravendita senatori, prescrizione per Berlusconi". Il Sole 24 ORE (in Italian). Retrieved 2017-04-20.
- "Cosa cambia con la prescrizione breve? Berlusconi "prescritto" per Mills a luglio | Blitz quotidiano". www.blitzquotidiano.it (in Italian). Retrieved 2017-04-20.
- "Cassazione: Berlusconi accusato di diffamazione a Di Pietro, si riparte da zero" (in Italian). Adnkronos. 19 January 2012. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
- "Cassazione: Berlusconi accusato di diffamazione a Di Pietro, si riparte da zero" (in Italian). LiberoQuotidiano.it. 19 January 2012. Archived from the original on 4 August 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
- "Italian ex-PM Berlusconi sentenced in Ruby sex case". BBC News Online. 24 June 2013. Retrieved 24 June 2013.
- "Processo Ruby, Silvio Berlusconi deposita appello e chiede assoluzione". Il Fatto Quotidiano. 2 January 2014. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
- "Silvio Berlusconi cavalca la guerra in procura per rallentare il processo Ruby". The Huffington Post. 10 June 2014. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
- "Legal victory for Berlusconi as court annuls prison sentence". The Italy News.Net. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- "Processo Ruby, Berlusconi assolto in appello" (in Italian). Ilpost.it. 18 July 2014. Retrieved 20 July 2014.
- "Caso Ruby, clamorosa sentenza in appello: Berlusconi assolto da tutti i reati" (in Italian). La Repubblica. 18 July 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2014.
- ""Ruby ter", indagato Berlusconi È accusato di avere corrotto i testimoni" (in Italian). Corriere Della Sera. 23 January 2014.
- "Napoli, pm chiede nuove indagini su Silvio Berlusconi" (in Italian). Il Giornale. 16 April 2014.