User:AmandaRR123/Special Collections Intro
Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]
Event Welcome[edit]
Thanks, sponsors and all those who helped!
How to get internet.
Why are we interested in Wikipedia?
A Brief Tour[edit]
- Basic article structure: lead section, infobox, body, see also, references, external links, categories, navboxes
- Links in the header bar: Article, Edit, View history, Talk
- References and sourcing (verifiability)
- Internal links
- Neutrality
A special collections-focused article: Community Resources for Justice
A more specialized article: Decipherment of rongorongo
Wikipedia:, Help:, and User: namespaces. How to find help.
Jump in[edit]
- Create your account, user, talk, and sandbox pages. Note the watchlist function.
- Sign in at the event page.
- Leave a message for me, or another participant, on our talk pages -- remember to sign your messages!
- Create sections, citations, and link to Wikipedia Cheatsheet
More Formatting Help[edit]
- Citation Guide
- Formatting Shortcuts -
- Wiki Markup Quick Reference
Good practices for contributing to Wikipedia[edit]
- What skills do you need to write a good encyclopedia article?
- What does the ideal good start-class article look like?
- What does the Platonically perfect article look like?
- What does a good-enough biography article look like?
- What advice does Wikipedia have for starting an article?
- See particularly the The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia Is Not
- Common student and new editor mistakes involve:
- Be bold (you can't actually delete anything!)
Participating in a community[edit]
- Instead of editing anonymously, create your user name, add a little info to the talk page, and remember which email address you use. You'll need it if you forget your password.
- Log in to check your talk page, or have it forwarded to your email.
- Develop new articles in your sandbox before posting to live.
- If editing an existing article, visit the talk page to see what work's already been discussed.
- If the article is very active, consider making smaller changes rather than large text replacements, to make it easier for others to follow your work.
- Comment out your edits, again to help others understand what you've done.
Welcome to Special Collections[edit]
What are special collections and archives? What makes something "special"?
What is "processing" a collection?
What is a finding aid, and what can you do with it on Wikipedia?
Special considerations for special collections topics on Wikipedia[edit]
- What makes something or someone notable? Wikipedia has particular guidelines for people.
- Primary vs. secondary, the role of finding aids, factual vs. evaluative sources.
- The finding aid should have bibliography for further sources. Do not only rely on the finding aid! It should be one of multiple reliable sources.
Sample finding aid citation[edit]
Medal, Dominique. "Collection Overview." Archives and Special Collections Finding Aids: Community Resources for Justice Records. Northeastern University Libraries, Archives and Special Collections, July 2013. Web. Accessed 03 March 2014.
Underrepresented groups[edit]
Systemic bias[edit]
- How many active (more than 5 edits per month) editors are on English Wikipedia?
- How many very active (more than 100 edits per month) editors are on English Wikipedia?
- What are the demographics of the average editor on English Wikipedia?
- What are the most common types of Featured Articles?
A sampling of the research[edit]
Geographic bias: The Information Geographies group at the Oxford Internet Institute has done some wonderful work on visualizing the geographic unevenness of Wikipedia coverage.
- "There is a clear and highly uneven geography of information in Wikipedia. Europe and North America are home to 84% of all articles. Anguilla has the fewest number of geotagged articles (four), and indeed most small island nations and city states have less than 100 articles. However, it is not just microstates that are characterised by extremely low levels of wiki representation. Almost all of Africa is poorly represented in the encyclopaedia. There are remarkably more Wikipedia articles (7,800) written about Antarctica than any country in Africa or South America. Even China, which is home to the world’s biggest population of Internet users and is the fourth largest country on Earth contains fewer than 1% of all geotagged articles."
Topic bias
- Wikipedia itself has documented gender bias in both editor demographics and topic coverage: Gender bias on Wikipedia
- In 2008, researchers found a strong bias in coverage and that "predictors of these biases include recency, importance, population, and financial wealth [of business companies included]." [1]
- In 2011, when comparing English-language Wikipedia and Polish-language Wikipedia, researchers found a strong difference in coverage of cultural figures, but still a U.S./English-language advantage throughout both.[2]
- In 2011, when comparing Wikipedia and Britannica, researchers found that while Wikipedia is much larger than Britannica and thereore has more articles on women, when looking at each encyclopedia's missing articles, Wikipedia was more likely to be missing articles on women.[3]
References
- ^ Royal, Cindy; Kapila, Deepina (2009-02-01). "What's on Wikipedia, and What's Not . . . ? Assessing Completeness of Information". Social Science Computer Review. 27 (1): 138–148. doi:10.1177/0894439308321890.
- ^ Callahan, Ewa S.; Herring, Susan C. (2011-10-01). "Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62 (10): 1899–1915. doi:10.1002/asi.21577.
- ^ Reagle, Joseph; Rhue, Lauren (2011-08-08). "Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica". International Journal of Communication. 5: 21. ISSN 1932-8036. Retrieved 2014-05-12.
Wonderful WikiProjects and to-do lists[edit]
WikiProject LGBT Studies: Things you can do
WikiProject African Diaspora: Current goals
WikiProject United States/Hispanic and Latino Americans: Open tasks
WikiProject Indigenous Peoples of North America: Articles requested