User:AnOddName/Snippets

I use the following for commenting, talk page tagging, edit summaries, and whatever else needs a quick response. Take and edit them for your own uses if you find them helpful!

{{subst:uw-vandalism1|Article|2=({{subst:diff|Article|7777|5555|This edit (or group of edits)}} was reverted.)|subst=subst:}}{{subst:SharedIPAdvice}}--~~~~

warning for [[Article]] revision 7777, using {{[[Template:uw-vandalism1|uw-vandalism1]]}}

{{subst:Welcomevandal|Article|AnOddName|({{subst:diff|Article|7777|5555|This edit (or group of edits)}} was reverted.)}}

welcome and warning for [[Article]] revisions, using {{[[Template:Welcomevandal|Welcomevandal]]}}

archive discussions to [[Talk:Article/Archive N]]. A list of archives is given at the end of the [[:Template:Talkheader|talkheader]]

Featured article candidates

Made for use at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates.

'''Technical comments''' *No [[WP:DAB|dab links]] or [[WP:CHECKLINKS|dead external links]], and all images have [[WP:ALT|alt text]] with no obvious errors. *Ref dates are consistent [[ISO 8601|ISO style]]. --~~~~

Refs mix [[ISO 8601|ISO-style (YYYY-MM-DD)]], [[Calendar date#Little endian forms.2C starting with the day|Day Month Year]], and even a few [[Calendar date#Middle endian forms.2C starting with the month|Month Day, Year]] dates. [[MOS:DATE#Full date formatting|Use one for all of them]]. I suggest either {{{1}}} (the most common in this article's refs) or {{{2}}} (MDY is used more in the US than other countries). --~~~~

Editor, do you have any thoughts on the article, its sources, etc.? Featuring an article takes [[WP:CONS|consensus]], [[WP:NOTVOTE|not simple votes]]—if [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] or someone else decided they should [[WP:FARC|review or un-feature]] this article and wonder why you supported it, what would you tell them? --~~~~

'''Not yet.''' Though New Cutie Honey has what I consider my best Wikipedia work, it still has [[Talk:New Cutie Honey/to do|long term issues]]. There may still be some stuff from [[New Cutie Honey#References|the Perfect Guides]] I can add, but I think only interviews and other fan-oriented stuff remain; if you think the article is already comprehensive without more of that ''and'' you can address ''all'' of the to do list issues, you are clear and can consider me a co-nominator. --~~~~

Peer review

[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Article/archiveN|peer review]]: blahblah

:I would suggest leaving it open as long as possible, so that sharper eyes who haven't found more problems (and there will be more problems) get their chance. You should consider finding a copyeditor even after the review, especially before going to FA (but ideally even before GA so that it can sail through). [[WP:DEADLINE|There is no deadline]] for Wikipedia, or for its articles' quality, so prepare as much as possible. (See also [[debugging]].) :You should only close if there's a flood of other edits that's keeping the article unstable. In that case, [[WP:GA?|keep it far from the GAN list (see criterion 5)]]. --~~~~