User:Dungflies/sandbox
| Scathophaga stercoraria | |
|---|---|
| |
| Male Scathophaga stercoraria | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | |
| Phylum: | |
| Class: | |
| Order: | |
| Section: | |
| Family: | |
| Subfamily: | |
| Genus: | |
| Species: | S. stercoraria
|
| Binomial name | |
| Scathophaga stercoraria | |
| Synonyms | |
Scathophaga stercoraria, commonly known as the yellow dung fly or the golden dung fly, is one of the most familiar and abundant flies in many parts of the northern hemisphere. As its common name suggests, it is often found on the feces of large mammals, such as horses, cows, sheep, deer, and wild boar, where it goes to breed.[1] The distribution of Scathophaga stercoraria is likely influenced by human agriculture, especially in Northern Europe and North America.[2] Scathophaga are integral in the animal kingdom due to their role in the natural erosion of dung in fields. They are also very important in the scientific world due to their short life cycles and susceptibility to experimental manipulations, and have thus contributed significant knowledge about animal behavior.[1]
Description[edit]
Scathophaga stercoraria are sexually dimorphic insects with an average lifespan of one to two months. The adult males of Scathophaga stercoraria are bright golden-yellow with orange-yellow fur on the front legs. Females are a little duller in color, with pronounced green-brown tinges, and no brightly colored fur on the front legs. The adults range from 5 mm to 11 mm in length, and the males are generally larger than the females.[2] The physical features of separate Scathophaga stercoraria populations can vary greatly, due in part to the range of locations in which the species is found.[1] Generally, they are located in cooler temperate regions, including North America, Asia, and Europe. They may also favor higher latitudes, such as the Swiss Alps, and higher altitudes, such as the Pyrenees. [2]
Feeding[edit]
The adults mainly prey on smaller insects — mostly other Diptera. They can also consume nectar and dung as additional sources of energy. In a laboratory setting, adult S. stercoraria can live off of solely ''Drosophila'' and water. [3] Females spend most of their time foraging in the surrounding vegetation and only visit dung pats to mate and oviposit on the dung surface. Both males and females are attracted to dung by scent, and approach dung pats against the wind. [3] Males will spend most of their time on the cow pats, waiting for females and feeding on other insects that visit the dung, such as blow-flies. In the absence of other prey, the yellow dung fly will turn to cannibalism. The “S. stercoraria” larva are coprophagous, relying on the dung pat for nutrition. [2]
Reproduction[edit]
S. stercoraria will breed on the dung of many large mammals, but generally prefer fresh cow pats. The operational sex ratio on these pats is very male biased and competition is high. Females are small and have limited pre-copulatory choice.[4] Copulation lasts 20-50 minutes, after which the male will attempt to guard the female from other males. Both males and females will often mate multiply. [5] Reproductive success depends on a variety of factors, including sperm competition, nutrition, and environmental temperature[2]
Anatomy[edit]
Females have paired accessory glands, which supply lubricants to the reproductive system and secrete protein-rich egg shells. Sperm is received in a large structure called the bursa copulatrix, and is stored in a structure called the spermatheca. Scathophaga have three spermathecae, (one pair and one singlet), each with its own narrow duct that connects it to the bursa. Sperm can be stored in the spermathecae for days, weeks, or even years, and sperm from several males can be stored simultaneously. [6]. Males have two projections, the paralobes, which are used to hold onto a female during copulation. Between the paralobes is the intromittent organ, the aedeagus, which transfers sperm into the female's bursa copulatrix.[7]
Behavior[edit]
During copulation, sperm are not directly deposited into sperm-storing organs. Ejaculation occurs in the bursa copulatrix, and then females actively move sperm into the spermathecae using their muscular spermathecal invagination to pump sperm into transit. This gives females a level of control over which and how much sperm enters her system, an example of cryptic female choice. Although current results are inconclusive regarding whether or not females are cryptically selecting for a better phenotypic match, it has been suggested that a female benefits from having variable sperm fertilizing her offspring. Such adaptations are advantageous because females benefit from being able to control which sperm are successful in fertilizing eggs. It may not be that the females are aware of which sperm are better suited for her offspring, but simply that being able to control the proportion of sperm from multiple mates can maximize the possibility of an optimal phenotypic match. It is to her advantage to have multiple males’ sperms reach her eggs, rather than just one. After copulation females prefer to lay their eggs on the small hills of the dung surface, avoiding depressions and pointed areas. This survival strategy aims to prevent desiccation and drowning so that the eggs are placed where they will have the greatest chance of reaching adulthood.[6]
Sexual Conflict[edit]
Countless studies have looked at the many manifestations of sexual conflict, including postmating sexual selection, in the yellow dung fly. Sperm competition occurs when a female mates with multiple males. Each male's sperm is then in direct competition to fertilize the eggs.
Sperm mix quickly once they reach the female's stores. The goal of males is to displace the sperm of other males as much as possible. Larger males tend to have longer copulation times and greater rates of sperm displacement. The fertilization success of males that were secondary mates increased as their body size relative to the first male increased.[8]
Traits such as body size, testis size, and sperm length are variable as well as heritable in S. stercoraria males, Larger sperm may be advantageous if they have greater propulsion along the female's spermathecal duct, resulting in higher fertilization success rates. When competition among males is high and females are mating with multiple males, those with the largest testes also have the most success in terms of proportion of sperm that fertilize a female’s eggs. The resulting male offspring would then have a similar advantage. A positive correlation was found between sperm length of males and spermathecal duct length of females. The size of male testis was also positively correlated with female spermathecae size. Additionally, females with larger spermathecae are better able to produce spermicidal secretion. This cryptic female choice betters their ability to influence paternity over their offspring. These covariances are an example of an “evolutionary arms race.” This suggests that each sex evolves certain traits to undermine the beneficial traits of the other, resulting in the coevolution of male and female reproductive systems of S. stercoraria. [9]
Life Cycle[edit]
The eggs that the female lays on the dung pat will hatch into larvae after 1-2 days, depending on temperature. The larvae quickly burrow into the dung for protection and feed on it. At 20°C, larvae undergo three molts over five days, during which they grow exponentially. [3] After growth, larvae spend another five days emptying their stomachs before pupation, where no additional body mass is gained. After 10-20 days the larvae burrow into the soil around and beneath the dung and pupate. The time needed for the juvenile flies to emerge can vary from 10 days at 25ºC to 80 days at 10ºC or less. The smaller females typically emerge a few days before the males. The fitness of the resulting juveniles is greatly dependent on the quality of the dung in which they were placed. Factors affecting dung quality include water content, nutritional quality, parasites, and drugs or other chemicals given to the animal.[2]
Yellow dung flies are anautogenous. In order to become sexually mature and produce viable eggs or sperm they must feed on prey to acquire sufficient proteins and lipids. [2] Females under nutritional stress will have higher rates of egg mortality and less survival of offspring to adult emergence. [10] Scathophaga stercoraria can then produce anywhere from 4 to 10 clutches per lifetime. The adults are active throughout much of the year in most moderate climates. [11]
Phenology[edit]
Yellow dung fly viability depends strongly on the environment. In warmer climates, there is often a sharp population decline in the summer months, when the temperature increases above 25°C. [3] Meanwhile, there is no population decline in colder climates, such as Iceland, Finland, northern England, and high elevations. Additionally, the number of generations per year varies with altitude and latitude, typically between two and four overlapping generations. [3] The end of winter synchronizes the first emergence in March, and the overwinter generations are produced in the fall. In northern Europe, where the mating season is shorter, only one or two generations can be expected. [3]
Phenotypic Plasticity[edit]
Yellow dung flies have extremely variable phenotypes, body size and development rate in particular. Proximate causes of variation include: juvenile nutrition, temperature, predation, and genetic variation. [3] Much phenotypic plasticity in yellow dung flies is a result of food(dung) availability in the larval stage, which is often mediated by conspecific competition. Experimentation shows that less dung, more competitors, and more pat drying all result in decreased growth rate and adult body size. [3] Additionally, when exposed to constant temperatures in a laboratory setting, higher temperatures during growth yield smaller flies. [3] Egg volume, but not clutch size, also decreases with increasing temperature. [3] Giving merit to the hypothesis that constraints on physiological processes at the cellular level account for temperature-mediated body size, studies have also shown that S. stercoraria body size varies via gene-by-environment interactions. Different cell lines vary significantly in growth, development, and adult body size in response to food limitation. [3]
Geographic Variation[edit]
S. stercoraria's phenotype has been shown to vary seasonally, latitudinally, and altitudinally. Seasonal variation occurs in S. stercoraria as a result an adaptive response to time constraints on development due to temperature changes. In the fall, as the temperature becomes cooler, the flies are able to increase development rate, so they can achieve the necessary, albeit smaller than average, size. [3] Furthermore, S. stercoraria development rate increases with increasing latitude. [3] This is likely an adaptive response to shorter mating seasons. Body size, but not development rate, vary with altitude. Dung flies are larger at higher altitudes as a result of colder temperatures. [3]
Reasons behind Phenotypic Plasticity[edit]
Larger yellow dung flies have a competitive advantage. Therefore, body size plasticity must be a survival mechanism. Studies show that offspring of large adults still survive under food limitations, despite needing more nutrients for a longer development. [3] Thus, the observed growth plasticity is a result of altering body chemistry and not differing survival rates of offspring from small and large parents. [3] Plastic development rate and body size are effective at avoiding premature death, meaning S. stercoraria adopt a strategy of being small and alive over large and dead. Smaller flies have an advantage in stressful environmental situations, due to larger dung flies needing more energy. [3] Additionally, there is low genetic differentiation between yellow dung fly populations, likely due to extensive gene flow, as S. stercoraria are able to travel great distances. [3] When species are unable to adapt through genetics, phenotypic plasticity is the most viable option to adjust to changing environments. Yellow dung flies develop in extremely variable environments, with pat drying, dung availability, and larvae competition hindering survival. Therefore, phenotypic plasticity allows S. stercoraria to adjust development according to unpredictable ecological situations without genetic adaptation. [3]
Parasites and diseases[edit]
Since Scathophaga stercoraria is a synanthropic fly, it does carry the risk of passively contaminating human food with various pathogens, molds, or yeasts.[12]
There are some known sexually transmitted diseases of insects, particularly in Coleoptera, Similar diseases have also been studied in Scathophaga stercoraria. Many of these sexually transmitted diseases are from multicellular ectoparasites (mites), protists or the fungus Entomophthora muscae. These are frequently responsible for either sterilizing or killing the host fly.[13]
Predators[edit]
Besides being an easy meal for a great many bird and bat species, they are also preyed upon by other insects. There is much competition between different species of larvae within a dung pat. Other insect species may also view the pats as ideal hunting grounds. These can include robber flies, and clown beetles.[14]
Use as a Model Organism[edit]
Like Drosophila melanogaster, the yellow dung fly is an ideal model organism due to its short life span and susceptibility to various experimental manipulations. Initial interest in yellow dung flies came from their potential as bio-control agents against pest-flies around livestock. In the past 40 years alone, countless studies have used S. stercoraria to research topics such as sperm competition, mating behavior, sexual conflict, reproductive physiology, thermal biology, and genetics. In particular, research on yellow dung flies has contributed greatly to understanding of multiple mating systems and sperm competition.
Recently, S. stercoraria was approved by the government as a standard required test species for eco-toxicological testing. This includes evaluating the residues of veterinary drugs in livestock dung. [2] Yellow dung flies are a key part of decomposing waste in pastures which is key to preventing the spread of endoparasites and returning nutrients to the soil. The species’ diet also serves to reduce the abundance of pest flies.[15] To test a chemical's toxicity, the chemical is mixed with bovine faeces, to which yellow dung fly eggs are added. Then, endpoints, such as sex and number of emerged adult flies, retardation of emergence, morphological change, and developmental rate, are measured and analyzed to determine toxicity. [16] A great deal of research has been done on the effects of avermectins on populations of S. stercoraria. Avermectins are drugs used to control endoparasites in livestock. The resulting dung contains drug residues that can have unintentional adverse effects on yellow dung fly populations, such as increased mutations and decreased offspring viability. If the use of such drugs in agriculture is not carefully monitored, there could be considerable economic losses. [17]
External links[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ a b c Blanckenhorn, W.U. (1997). "Altitudinal life history variation in the dung flies Scathophaga stercorar'ia and Sepsis cynipsea". Oecologia. 109 (3): 342–352. doi:10.1007/s004420050092.
- ^ a b c d e f g h [1],Blanckenhorn, W. U., Bussiere, L. F., Floate, K. D., Pemberton, A. J., & Roembke, J. (2010). “A review of the natural history and laboratory culture methods for the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria”. Journal of Insect Science, Volume 10, Article 1. Cite error: The named reference "blanckenhorn" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Blanckenhorn, W. (2009). "Causes and Consequences of Phenotypic Plasticity in Body Size". Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects. doi:10.1201/b10201-11. ISBN 978-1-57808-423-4.
- ^ Arthur, B. I.; Sbilordo, S. H.; Pemberton, A. J.; Ward, P. I. (2008). "The anatomy of fertilization in the yellow dung flyScathophaga stercoraria". Journal of Morphology. 269 (5): 630–637. doi:10.1002/jmor.10617. PMID 18196572.
- ^ Martin, O.Y.;Hosken,D.J.; Ward P.I. (2004). "Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria". Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 271 (1537): 353–359 pp. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2588. PMC 1691601. PMID 15101693.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Ward, P. I.; Foglia, M.; Blanckenhorn, W. U. (1999). "Oviposition site choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria". Ethology. 105 (5): 423–430 pp. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00419.x.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Parker, G. A.; Simmons, L. W. (2000). "Optimal Copula Duration in Yellow Dung Flies: Ejaculatory Duct Dimensions and Size-Dependent Sperm Displacement". Evolution. 54 (3): 924–935. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0924:ocdiyd]2.3.co;2. JSTOR 2640584.
- ^ [2],Simmons, L. W., and Parker, G.A. (1992) “Individual variation in sperm competition success of yellow dung flies, Scatophaga stercoraria”. Evolution, Vol 46(2):366-375.
- ^ Minder, A. M.; Hosken, D. J.; Ward, P. I. (2005). "Co-evolution of male and female reproductive characters across the Scathophagidae (Diptera)". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 18 (1): 60–69. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00799.x. PMID 15669961.
- ^ Jann, P.; Ward, P. I. (1999). "Maternal Effects and Their Consequences for Offspring Fitness in the Yellow Dung Fly". Functional Ecology. 13 (1): 51–58. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00269.x. JSTOR 2656427.
- ^ Martin, O.Y.;Hosken,D.J.; Ward P.I. (2004). "Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria". Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 271 (1537): 353–359 pp. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2588. PMC 1691601. PMID 15101693.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Olson, Alan R. (1996). Fundamentals of Microanalytical Entomology: A Practical Guide to Detecting and Identifying Filth in Foods. Florida: CBC Press, Inc. p. 41. ISBN 0849389259.
- ^ Knell, R.K. Webberley, K.M. (2004). "Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour". Biological Reviews, Cambridge University Press. 79: 557–581 pp.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Stubbs, A. and Drake, M. (2001). British Soldierflies and their Allies. pp. 512 pp. ISBN 1-899935-04-5.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|unused_data=ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Cite error: The named reference
wallwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Test No. 228: Determination of Developmental Toxicity of a Test Chemical to Dipteran Dung Flies(Scathophaga stercoraria L. (Scathophagidae), Musca autumnalis De Geer (Muscidae))". OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems. 2008. doi:10.1787/9789264067479-en. ISBN 9789264067479.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Wall, R.; Beynon, S. (2012). "Area-wide impact of macrocyclic lactone parasiticides in cattle dung". Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 26 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00984.x. PMID 22007907.
Category:Scathophagidae Category:Coprophagous animals Category:Animals described in 1758