User talk:PhilPsych

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, PhilPsych. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamith (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, PhilPsych. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Belated welcome[edit]

Hello, PhilPsych, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) Join WER 21:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for organizing your userspace[edit]

Hi again, Phil.

I see that you're creating a lot of drafts, all directly under your primary userpage. I suggest you create Table_of_contents of sorts to organize your drafts. I put mine in my sandbox. To create a new page, I just go to edit, copy-and-paste [[User:Doctree/sandbox and then type in the name I want followed by the closing two brackets. When I save it, a WP:REDLINK is created. Click on a Redlink and a page will open with cautions about creating a new article and a blank workspace. As soon as you put something into the space and save it, it will be a blue link. You could create a subpage User:PhilPsych/mydrafts rather than using your sandbox. More about userpages at WP:USERPAGE. Your username will become blue if you put something in your main userspace.

If you ever lose a draft (and you probably will if you edit a lot), go to the very top of any page in your userspace and click on 'Contributions'. At the very bottom of the page that opens, you will see your username on the left followed by a colon and 'Subpages'. Left-click on 'Subpages' and you will see all of your subpages, possibly some that you didn't know existed. If you want to see mine, go to my userpage and click on 'User contributions' under 'Tools' in the navigation bar on the far left of the page (or just click on the upside down Cont in my signature). Note that anybody who knows Wikipedia can do the same on your pages so...

You may want the draft that was indexed by Google to go away rather than stay as a blank page. Anybody who's really knowledgeable can still find your subpages but they will have to work a bit harder. Put {{Db-self}} at the top of that page and an administrator will delete the page for you. Once done, only other administrators can see what was there in the history files.

Hope this is helpful. Take care, DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) Join WER 23:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Thank you Doctree for the welcome and the tips.PhilPsych (talk) 03:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology, Canadian Psychological Association (November 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology, Canadian Psychological Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goethe Award for Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Scholarship (November 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Goethe Award for Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Scholarship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Mills (psychologist) has been accepted[edit]

Jon Mills (psychologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Fonagy[edit]

Hi, this is just to let you know that I did some work on the Peter Fonagy article, which you contributed to. Mainly standardizing the reference format. If you have time maybe you could check it to see if I messed anything up. Also, about the Goethe Award, if you want you can just go ahead and move your draft to Goethe Award for Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Scholarship in the main article space, just as it is. It doesn't have all the information that Cullen and I wanted, but neither of us would oppose it. It does have the public information that is available, and it's not like Wikipedia has too many articles on psychology. So I don't really see turning away a high-quality article like this one just because of technicalities. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2014 (UTC) That is so helpful. I will definitely check over the Fonagy article references. I saw the reference problem but was not confident to fix it up on my own, but am very pleased to check over what you have done. Thanks also for your advice on the Goethe Award. PhilPsych (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Weininger Memorial Award (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 16:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! PhilPsych, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 16:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Weininger Memorial Award has been accepted[edit]

Otto Weininger Memorial Award, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 18:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology, Canadian Psychological Association concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology, Canadian Psychological Association, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology, Canadian Psychological Association[edit]

Hello, PhilPsych. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Section on Psychoanalytic and Psychodynamic Psychology, Canadian Psychological Association}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]