User talk:AdamSmith12

October 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. I see you have created at least 20 inappropriate articles, including obvious advertisements such as Massage Abu Dhabi Services. After I warned you and blocked you on 24 July 2016, you have persisted in poor and unconstructive behaviour, for instance removing again and again deletion templates on Namrata Sapkota, and just yesterday creating yet another promotional article, per the above post. See my strong warning here on the talkpage you were then using even though it wasn't yours. (That was very confusing for everybody — I'm not sure whether you were doing that deliberately or not, as you never answered any questions about it — but I assume you read my block notice, at least.) I have never seen a useful edit from you, only a lot of waste of other people's time. I believe you are a paid spammer. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason= Still you are following me. Really you are crazy you dont have other work only you need time pass. The reason which you are showing is past activities. And yes block me and dance alone i will not give my important time to you for time pass. Be happy and Be Human Thanks}}

. Bishonen | talk 16:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I have merged in the contents of the revision history of what was once User talk:Adamsmith to this talk page (User talk:AdamSmith12). For several months, this talk page redirected to User talk:Adamsmith, which is an entirely unrelated account to this one. The disruption caused by this was part of the basis for the original block of this account. (It led, among other things, to the accidental blocking of that account.) Bishonen cited a diff above that was originally on User talk:Adamsmith, but I have since merged that to this talk page's history. I realize this may cause some confusion for diffs like Bishonen's, but I hope it helps preserve more easily the continuity of warnings and messages that were sent to AdamSmith12 during the time when they were actively editing with that account. It also restores the clean talk page of Adamsmith, in the unlikely event that they ever wish to return to active editing with that account. Mz7 (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prakash Poudel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakash Poudel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Poudel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prem Bahadur B.K (Aparajit Prem)[edit]

The article Prem Bahadur B.K (Aparajit Prem) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prem Bahadur B.K (Aparajit Prem)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prem Bahadur B.K (Aparajit Prem) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Girish Khatiwada[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Girish Khatiwada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Girish Khatiwada[edit]

The article Girish Khatiwada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable singer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 66.87.68.167 (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Girish Khatiwada for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girish Khatiwada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girish Khatiwada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krishna Bhattarai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishna Bhattarai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Bhattarai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SeytX (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viber BI for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viber BI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viber BI until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SeytX (talk) 08:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]