User talk:Vandijk6

Welcome on my talk page! Do you have anything to ask, mention or tell? Go ahead!

Best regards, Vandijk6 (talk) 20:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Vandijk6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for The Baseballs. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 20:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

"Het is een Nacht"

You seem to be almost the sole editor of Het is een Nacht. Quite a lot of the material in the article is lacking reliable sources. Most importantly, I was really tempted to remove the unsourced world sales figure. Could you please either supply a source, or remove the unsourced information? Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I added some sources from Dutch sites (I couldn't find English ones). I hope it is better now. I got some information from the Dutch Wikipedia. Do I have to mention that somewhere in the page Het is een Nacht? Best regards, vandijk6.

Per WP:NOENG, "English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones, assuming English sources of equal quality and relevance are available" but if there are no English ones, you can use non-English sources. The guideline also says what you need to include in that case (probably nothing in this case, it seems like a clear cut fact). I'm going to assume that the sources indeed verify the facts - that Meeuwis wrote the song after a romantic weekend with his girlfriend Valérie Gregoire, and that it sold 250,000 copies.

If you took information from the Dutch Wikipedia, it really depends on whether you translated the Dutch Wikipedia article, or wrote your own article and just used it as a reference/check list. For the former case, attribution is required. You can read all about it here, but basically it is quite simply adding {{Translated page}} to the talk page. I hope this helps. --Muhandes (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

The Dutch sources did verify the facts, but I found an English one as well. The English one is almost the same as the Dutch one, but if English sources are preferred over non-English ones, this is better. I also added {{Translated page}} to the talk page. I think the article has improved. - Vandijk6 (talk) 19:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I agree, I think it's a nice little article. It's a bit of a shame you didn't push it to Did You Know, I'm pretty sure it would have made it. If you are interested, next time, let me know and I'll help if I can. Best regards.--Muhandes (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know what Did You Know was. Maybe it's an idea to push my new article "Strings 'n' Stripes" to DYK ? -Vandijk6 (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

It needs to be at least 1500 characters, outside tables, infoboxes etc. It now has... 150 chars. It also needs a catchy sentence, which I don't see how to do on this one. And it needs to be nominated no more than 5 days from the creation. --Muhandes (talk) 20:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Gers Pardoel

Hoi VanDijk. Ik zag je bijdrage Gers Pardoel op de Engelse Wikipedia - goed werk! Zou je wellicht die informatie willen vertalen naar de Nederlandse Wiki? Jou versie ziet er toch een stukje mooier uit dan de huidige Nederlandse versie. Groetjes, Grashoofd (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hoi Grashoofd. Bedankt voor je compliment ;) Ik geef je gelijk dat de versie op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia er nu niet heel mooi uit ziet, al denk ik dat mijn Engelse versie ook nog niet helemaal perfect is. Ik zal zeker kijken wat ik kan doen! Groetjes, Vandijk6 (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Ik heb mijn best gedaan. Zou je even kunnen kijken wat je ervan vindt en of je nog op- of aanmerkingen hebt? Alleen de bronnen hebben ik nog niet toegevoegd. Die staan al wel op de Engelse pagina. Moeten die dan ook nog op de Nederlandse worden geplaatst? Fijn weekend nog :) Vandijk6 (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Ahh, geweldig! Dat ziet er een stuk beter uit. De bronnen moeten er nog wel eventjes bij, dat klopt, maar dat zal ik later nog wel eventjes doen, of dit mag je zelf doen als je tijd hebt. Het artikel heeft nog wel even een poets nodig bij de discografie, maar daar ben ik momenteel mee bezig. Nogmaals, dank! Groet, Grashoofd (talk) 00:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Damaru (singer).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Damaru (singer).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Smit discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch and German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

About Jan Smit discography

I see that you created this article. But usually discography pages are only created when a majority of the artist's albums and/or singles have their own articles. If you want to avoid someone nominating this for deletion (or merging to Jan Smit), it would be best if you started by creating some album articles (with refs to reliable sources establishing their notability of course). Cheers. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 16:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dutch Top 40, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vandijk6. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vandijk6. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vandijk6. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)