User talk:Eaglestorm

The Running Man

Thanks for your praise. I've been looking at a number of plot summaries lately, and I've seen some that I envy for being so well-written and concise (look at the one for Bambi, for example ... I love how short it is). Hopefully we can control plot bloat after this fix. Thanks again. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

YOu are a lying F*****G bastard.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Whether there is consensus on the talk page or not, don't resort to edit warring, request help (as you have done now). This is just a note to inform you that edit warring isn't allowed in such circumstances. Taelus (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Eaglestorm. You have new messages at Taelus's talk page.
Message added 14:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Taelus (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

CoH: Eastern Front

I'm afraid I can't provide a copy of the article - only a Wikipedia administrator can do that since the article has been deleted - your best options would be to leave a message on the user talk page of the admin who closed the debate, or on the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard. Cynical (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll do that. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alpha Kappa Rho

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alpha Kappa Rho. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Kappa Rho (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. == Go to hell you bloody bastard ==

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Request citations before deleting

If an item is unsourced you should ask for a citation before deleting. Material without sources should not be deleted immediately with the exception of contentious or potentially material in biography articles. Assume the editors who added the information were acting in good faith, and if they are given a chance will try to provide a source. They may simply have believed the item was uncontentious and did not need source, and deleting the material completely makes it much harder for other editors to help out. In this case a google search for "how i met your mother season 6" turned up a source as the second result so the material was definitely not contentious. In other cases the sources may be a little harder to find but give editors a chance to improve things before deleting. -- Horkana (talk) 06:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey Horkana, before you rant off to me about removing sources, why don't you stop pushing your edits on the plots? It's bordering on the ones done at Television Without Pity, which is not appropriate. --Eaglestorm (talk) 04:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Help on profile in Pinoy Big Brother: Teen Clash 2010

I know you must be busy with offline life right now, but I also need some help rephrasing the profiles of the housemates in the article using not only from the official website, but also either from mukamo.com or from several reliable sources. I've seen asking this because Active Banana (talk · contribs) has been removing the profiles because he said they're either unsourced or more like analysis to him (I think he's from outside the Philippines, which I think can justify his actions). Will you do that for me? Thanks. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I'll do what I can. Some of what profile stuff I put in were rephrased from the official site. --Eaglestorm (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

And also, can you leave a note to Active Banana saying not to touch the section? I don't want to argue with the guy. Thanks. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 16:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I slapped him with a uw-delete2, given the circumstances.--Eaglestorm (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Help for the Melason page too. He's also been reverting and deleting stuff.--TwelveOz (talk) 19:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I think you should tell him further not to remove the profiles. He's not letting up and he's justifying WP:BLP as the reason for his edits. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 14:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

It seems that uw-delete2 just turned him on. I even had to delete his message here because hindi ko yan papatulan (I'm not gonna sing to his tune) He already had a long sermon in his talk page regarding his deletionism, and it seems he doesn't want to even learn one bit from it. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Then I guess you should forward him to WP:AN/I. Like I already stated earlier, I don't want to deal with him either. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 14:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

PS: I can also suggest that you get some help from several admins about him. I recommend forwarding the problem to Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs) or Black Kite (talk · contribs). - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 14:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

If the admins side with the guy, then we have no other choice but to find good third-party sources for the profiles, especially from PEP. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 20:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: Active Banana

Re your message: As I just told Nanami Kamimura, I happen to agree with the removal of the personal descriptions. Personal descriptions like those must be sourced. While some of the descriptions are fairly benign, some of the others have a negative tone to it and therefore must be sourced. Some of them are a little bit flowery, too, like for instance the second to last profile. If you can provide sources for the profiles, things would a lot better. Also, try to see if you can work out the issue on the talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, need help as well with Active Banana, he is now messing up and deleting artices on Philippine Pay-TV companies as well as wiki pages of ABS-CBN. Can you help, thanks. -- G8crash3r (talk) 02:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Melason#Info_boxes_for_later_series.3F_Yes_or_no

Please join the discussion about why info boxes for the later seasons should or should not be included in the article. Active Banana (talk) 18:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

You drive by and cull everything we've worked on for the past few years, and you expect those whom you offended to help you out? Get off our case, AB. Eaglestorm (talk) 09:24, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Ahmad shahi

Hi. There has been a second complaint against Ahmed shahi at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ahmed_shahi. You may want to comment on it, since I have quoted your previous message. Take care. (Please note that I am not asking you to "help me". Just wanted you to know that your name has been mentioned.) Tajik (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Yes, recreation of an article deleted at Afd is one of the grounds for speedy deletion. However I'm not an admin so it isn't my decision - I've tagged the article with the relevant notice so that an admin will take a look at it. Regards Cynical (talk) 23:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

What about its talk page? Can that be deleted too? --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Red Dawn

The link removed for the Red Dawn fan site was the original source for most of the photos and news that the referencing site used to get their news. Not sure why this would not be a relevant link for this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geekincognito (talk • contribs) 15:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

'Not sure'? Try reading WP:EL--Eaglestorm (talk) 03:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

No, I've read and understand it, but if the site is THE source for many of the other news sites information; why wouldn't it be a valuable link to have. The WP:EL article states, "...most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority." This fansite is the source of most of the images (original content), news and has direct connections to MGM. Define "recognized authority" other than a news site or MGM themselves that would fall under the term "fansite", because the term "recognized authority" is being used to describe a fansite.

I'm really just trying to understand the decision making process on this. If you have a valid reason, other than blindly siting the WP:EL, I would understand. Others agree with my point and I have put this in the discussion thread on the article.--Geekincognito (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Eaglestorm. You have new messages at Fallschirmjäger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Fallschirmjäger  ✉  14:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 24 Hours, for Violation of the three-revert rule at Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem, I'm sitting this out and thanks, it was totally worth it. --Eaglestorm (talk) 06:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry man, I really am. I couldn't block Whitmore 8621 unless I blocked you both. It's not a great solution but it's the only one. Kindest regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. Oh, and I have a pending SPI too against the guy.--Eaglestorm (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Update: This is no longer active, but I'm keeping this because it's a badge of honor, unlike those who use WP:BLANKING to hide their sins. --Eaglestorm (talk) 06:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Whitmore 8621/Sock Puppet Investigations/211.28.45.180

Hello I noticed my account name is under a investigation list why is this, I have been doing nothing to disrupt Wikipedia at All. You believe that because I sign a comment that I am the same user that is ridiculous, I read this 220.244.146.157 IP users contributions and yours, It seems you two have a edit war or a problem with each other, Both of you a like The United States and Soviet Union in this sense you do not just like each other. Tanner-2762--Tanner- 2762 (talk) 09:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

This is my IP Address 211.28.45.180 you reverted some of my edits on Return To Castle Wolfenstein in 2009. --Tanner- 2762(Talk) Tanner- 2762 (talk) 11:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)