User talk:TwelveOz

Welcome

Hello, TwelveOz, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Codf1977

Happy editing! Codf1977 (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ivan Dorschner. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. That also includes setting up a redirect. Codf1977 (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ivan Dorschner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ironholds (talk) 13:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter what others agree, the rules of a AfD are clear, you must not change or remove the notice, so you will have to wait until the AfD is over. Codf1977 (talk) 14:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Dorschner

It would be helpful if you made sure all of your arguments were based on policy. The article does not read like it was made by a fan - your post, however, reads like it was made by someone with an intense dislike. Personal opinions have no place on Wikipedia. Ironholds (talk) 21:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So, "Among the aims he wants to achieve in the show is to speak Filipino fluently as he is more adept in using English.", doesnt sound fanmade for you? Its a very opinion-like information rather than a formal information. Plus, everyone on frowns upon pages created by fans, specially if the page made is unnotable. --TwelveOz (talk) 00:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pinoy Big Brother: Teen Clash 2010

Please leave the housemates sections clean and don't overuse tables. Of course, the Teenternational Housemates aren't referred to as the second batch of housemates, so let's keep the list to just flags instead. (I'm sure they're like the Guardians who competed separately). - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 15:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am only basing it by the Double Up page, there are 3 sections, First Batch, Second Batch (and for your sake, let's call it Teenternational Housemates, but it doesn't seem formal) and lastly the Replacement Housemates. And since there are two houses, it is inevitable that the housemates will change houses by time to time.--TwelveOz (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a weak reason. And don't base the arrangement according to that article. Furthermore, I'm sure the foreign housemates are not regular housemates for sure. Please leave the housemates section alone for the meantime before we commit WP:3RR. After all, it's Eviction Night tonight. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 15:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But the section is only for their "Houses" , and not as part of the competetion. If they are part of the competetion, they will be listed on the logo section and the nomination table. That section is only for their house. --TwelveOz (talk) 15:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is all I wanted to point out. I am not dubbing them as part of the competition (yet, because we are not sure), but only to show their houses. --TwelveOz (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I'm yet familiar with the Teenternational housemates and did not get the nomination totals for tonight. Can you fill the nomination history for me? Thank you - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 15:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalka

Hello, as the only other registered editor who has worked on the page, I will leave you the note I left on the creators page:

Do you have any third party sources indicating this show Rosalka has reached the state that it is no longer in violation of WP:CRYSTAL / WP:NFF? If so, please add them to the article or I soon nominate the article for deletion. Thanks! Active Banana (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Momay

When you have third party sources that verify the information and it is presented in a neutral point of view instead of advertising promo, I wont delete it en masse, until then, WP:BURDEN applies and removal of the content is not in any way WP:VANDALISM. Active Banana (talk) 12:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People do have lives outside Wikipedia and may take time to re-edit the pages, so please have patience. That is the reason why the tag was inserted, its not touch and go. Having the tag in for only 30 minutes in the page wouldn't fix the information right away. Plus, if you really do want to improve and help the page, why don't you do it yourself instead of deleting the whole information?

And I didn't mention that it was in any way vandalism, I said that removing WP:AGF edits when they are clearly not vandalisms are unnecessary.--TwelveOz (talk) 12:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BURDEN You can return the conten WHEN you provide sources, until then it is not appropriate at all to return unsourced gossip to to articles. Active Banana (talk) 13:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA Notice

[1] Please do not continue to make unsubstantiated accusations of racism. Any editor can be from the Philippines, or England or Mars for that matter and edit any article or set of articles they choose as long as they are editing within the wikipedia policies and guidelines. The fact that a number of my edits have been to improve Philippine based media articles and I have not (yet) attempted (in any focused manner) to improve media articles from other countries that also suck is not in any stretch of the imagination "racism." Active Banana (talk) 18:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines#Pinoy_Big_Brother_biographies_must_be_brought_back--TwelveOz (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will this work?

You have demanded an apology:

I am sorry that you are upset that I am not cleaning up other Big Brother articles.

Now will you apologize for making multiple insinuations that racist motivations are the reason that I am not cleaning up other articles? Active Banana (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it did. Thank you. I was not accusing you of any racism, but for this to be finished, then I apologize for that.--TwelveOz (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Active Banana has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Active Banana (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting sections...

is not the first thing you'd do. You'll have to tag it/slap with it {{fact}} it first then wait for a few weeks until someone finds references. If someone doesn't find one, then remove it, but don't remove it at first sight. Wholesale removal of contributions from other editors is not very helpful and might provoke untoward reaction to you. Unless it's copvios, of course. –Howard the Duck 19:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dorchner redirect

I don't think redirects are normally clearly implicated in notability guidelines, but you raise a legitimate point and all, and I wasn't aware that actually clogged up search engine results (I didn't think redirects showed up in those - you learn something new every day, I guess!), so I suppose clearing it up probably wouldn't hurt. - Vianello (Talk) 18:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there TwelveOz, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:TwelveOz/Noah (TV series). In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kablog.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kablog.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mythology and characters of Noah (Philippine TV series)

The article Mythology and characters of Noah (Philippine TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no third party sourcing to show notability/anything other than original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 16:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overwriting image / image name not reflect content

Is there a reason you overwrote the Rubi image with an image from Imortal? [2] This is also falls afoul of the image naming policy which should reflect the contents. Active Banana (^bananaphone 16:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLPN

Back in April, you were involved in a discussion about the article Pinoy_Big_Brother:_Teen_Clash_2010. Some editors said that there were BLP violations. There is now a discussion about that article at the Biographies of Living Persons Noticeboard (BLPN). Please come to BLPN to say whether you think there are BLP violations in the article now.Anythingyouwant (talk) 04:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dear wish ko la sana ma bigyan nyo po ka my nag kontig ka kagamitan nakatira kami sa 77 trapich tanaun city narvaez family..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.208.121.190 (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed blackout in protest of R.A.10175

Dear TwelveOz,

Greetings!

As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 14, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.

Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.

Thank you and maraming salamat po!

Kind regards,

Tito Pao (talk) 02:19, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]