User talk:YumeChaser

Singles vs EPs

I know you follow WP:NSONGS for premature singles, but I thought it was strange to treat some of them as songs, as they are more like albums (or at least EP's) than songs. In fact, iTunes often treats them as EPs. Take the Sunrise/Sunset single by Hamasaki. It's clearly not just a song. Anyways, I took it to the discussion page of WP:NSONGS, and I figured you'd want to put in your input. Also, I salute you for your diligence with keeping these pages. We're lucky to have you. Glaexeaus (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

A "song" per Wikipedia Music is a non-single or a B-side, see here I don't know why but it is. It doesn't matter what iTunes treat it as because iTunes treats mostly everything with more than one song as an EP. We can't treat them as an album or an EP because they weren't released as such. If the artist releases it as an EP or an album, then and only then and we say "okay the page can stay since the released date and track list has been confirmed". Another issue with the page is the lack of sources the page can't stay as a stand alone with one source saying it exists. Yes, "Sunrise/Sunset" is a single and people call songs singles. Which is mostly likely why they have it under WP:NSONGS. MS (Talk|Contributions) 16:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Brexx

javascript:delink_dates_to_dmy_and_common_terms() Hey!

Sorry about not replying yesterday, I went off-line for the day just a few minutes before you sent me that message.

Anyways, I concur with Nishkid, that was a nice catch. I'm usually pretty good at picking out Brexx socks from a mile away so feel free to ask for a second opinion if you come across any more.

Thanks! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 12:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Yuna Ito

Where is the source about Yuna Ito = Korean ??? --Kookyunii (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me that it needed a source. Now it is sourced from a reliable source, I should add. MS (Talk|Contributions) 18:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't Dare to Warn me discourteously before you find the detailed reason of the situation. Observe the proprieties. Your words and actions often made me displeased. -- Kookyunii (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

It's actually a KNOWN fact that she is Korean, so a source IS not needed. A quick Google check would have told you that a it would have came from a reliable source too. But after someone else removed the categories that I got the source. I haven't said anything negative to you before and I don't plan on starting. As for my actions, I am just following the rules. So sorry if they displease you. MS (Talk|Contributions) 19:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

She Wolf

In that case, I'll remove the template. Admc2006 (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Nami Tamaki - Negai Boshi

Okay, sometimes the name of the song isn't completely in the chorus, and sometimes it is. I don't understand why you're saying it's Negai Hoshi. There have been other songs with the same kanji, and it's been Negai Boshi. Hoshi is never used, please be more precise at least, 'cause it makes more sense to just call it Negai Boshi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuubari (talk • contribs) 06:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I have reported you for violation the three revert rule. I asked you to discuss the problem not once but twice. You should have done so after I asked you the first time. Now onto Negai H/Boshi, if you knew a bit of Japanese you'd the kanji 星 means Hoshi and not Bōshi (某氏). Anyway, I'm going to redirect the page to Friends! seeing how the article fails both WP:NSONGS and WP:N. Have fun editing and don't leave a reply here, it makes no sense since I have already reported you. Also, I'll just remove it since you didn't want to talk it out when I asked you to. MS (Talk|Contributions) 06:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Last Friends

An article isn't supposed to be in both Category:Japanese television dramas and Category:Drama television series at the same time; the Japanese category is already a subcategory of the general one. Unfortunately, HotCat doesn't offer the ability to explain why a category is being added or removed. Bearcat (talk) 06:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honorific titles in popular music (2nd nomination)

As one of the largest contributor to this article, I wanted to let you know that the article is currently up for deletion. Ikip (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

TVXQ

Can you give me a good reason why I can't add the Guinness World Records part on the TVXQ article besides saying that it's trivial? It's pretty noticeable to be listed in the book. Even the world's tallest man has an article on Wikipedia because of that. Someone963852 (talk) 00:45, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say that it was just trivial read the edit summary again, I believe there was more than just "Remove for being trivial". Having the most number-one singles for a foreign artist in Japan is an achievement, having the largest fanclub and the most pictures taken are not. The record holds no importance whatsoever. So what they got the largest fanclub and the most pictures taken. What importance does that have to the article? None, all of that is basically a fun fact. And I don't see you are bringing up the world's tallest man here, because TVXQ's article doesn't exist because of the Guinness World Record. MS (Talk|Contributions) 01:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it doesn't matter how many pictures they have taken or how big their fan club is, but being in the Guinness World Records is definitely a big accomplishment. As for the tallest man thing, that was just an example of how an average person would become well known because of their record. A few even have their own article on Wikipedia, even though it's just a few sentences short and that Wikipedia is not a record book.. ([1][2]) I'll leave it for now to avoid edit-warring but I'm still not impressed or even persuaded one bit by your response. Someone963852 (talk) 01:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Look who's talking.

You already broke the 3-revert-rule on TVXQ by reverting my edit. You're just lucky no one reported you yet. [3][4][5]Someone963852 (talk) 22:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC) I didn't revert your edit I removed it. THEN I reverted your edits. MS (Talk|Contributions) 00:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:BonesS1.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BonesS1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Touch Me!

On August 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Touch Me!, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

OK

Would U like to participate in the That's Where You Take Me deletion nomination Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/That's_Where_You_Take_Me_(2nd_nomination) ?? --PlatinumFire 20:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

OBI

he is a real person. I personally live in Japan and have seen him multiple times on TV along with his cousin Crystal Kay. There are some Japanese sites that talk about him. please look at those. thankyou —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.198.70.225 (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I did Google searches and searched Japanese sites. There is no proof that "OBI" is real. If you can provide proof that shows that he is real then present it here. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

(can't remember if I had replied to you sorry >_<)

Sorry about the talk page being littered with forum-style topics. It won't happen again. If I have any further questions about TVXQ I'll just ask you if it's ok with you.

~Garfield Turtle Anime~ (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC) Hajiru

Kumi Koda : What type of vandalism?

Verifiability issue - Cleared

OR issue - Cleared

BLP issue - Cleared

Please explain it before reverting the edit.

- 218.222.47.61 (talk) 02:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

NONE of those three are "cleared'. I did a Google search is nothing you add as a "quote" was found. So WP:V, WP:OR AND WP:BLP is still an issue. I honestly doubt she would say, "because I was fat like now, short like now, ugly like now , yet not slutty like now" about her self. You are adding in a libel statement that you CANNOT and HAVE NOT proved. MS (Talk|Contributions) 03:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

meaningless

What does "obtrude" mean when used this way? If you want to add that text, then take it to talk, and get a consensus as to what it is supposed to mean, and how to say it. Don't just keep placing unclear text into the article. I took it out rather than fix it because I have no idea how to fix it.—Kww(talk) 12:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

reverting my edit

DO NOT revert my edits. It was added to the comments page because I am curious about why the release dates are so different. It's important. Just like it's important that you list all the tracks, explain the meaning of any titles, etc. Wikipedia is not censored so if you removed my comments because I mentioned downloading songs then shame on you. Do not revert my edits again.--217.203.157.248 (talk) 18:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your comment wasn't removed because you mentioned you downloaded the album. It was removed per WP:NOTAFORUM the talk isn't a place for you to talk about why the release dates are weird, where people download movies and music from nor is it a place for you to whine about how the music industry is destroying itself and is run by morons. The talk is suppose to be used for editors to discuss changes to the article. And if you don't want your edits reverted them simply don't edit. It says that on the bottom before you press "save page". MS (Talk|Contributions) 19:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Look arsehole stop reverting my edits. I said before that it was a valid comment for the talk page. Show me some binding international law (rather than a petty wikipedia policy) that states otherwise. Revert again and you and Wikipedia will be sued.--217.203.157.248 (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)