User talk:Συντάκτης

Hello and welcome to the user talk page for Συντάκτης[edit]

This is Συντάκτης's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

What this user edits[edit]

This user edits these pages:
YTechnology articles. All articles in technology.
YAutomotive articles All automotive articles including emergency vehicle articles, automotive lighting articles, and other vehicle equipment articles.
YThis user will also edit many other articles.
YUser talk pages
YTalk pages

@Συντάκτης: I have removed your false claim above that you block IPs and users that do bad editing. If you hope to ever have that privilege, you would do well to avoid making such claims. Also, please remove your statement above that you clear the sandbox; clearing the sandbox is not your job; it is done by a bot. teb728 t c 07:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and I have removed that claim. Συντάκτης (talk) 02:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BAMM[edit]

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Συντάκτης, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Συντάκτης. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Your edit summary in Special:Diff/655139243 was a personal attack. In addition, please do not re-add the administrator topicon. Thanks. --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox[edit]

Hi. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, it is not your job to patrol the sandbox and decide what is and isn't constructive. The sandbox is cleared regularly by bots, and the headers are automatically replaced. Warning users for unconstructive editing in the sandbox is actually unconstructive on your end, because this is precisely what the sandbox is for - testing and potentially unconstructive edits. Please leave people alone to do their editing tests there instead of reverting them every so often. This was unwarranted - people paste articles into the sandbox to work with them without messing up the real article. If you wish to make sandbox edits, you can do it in your own sandbox where you can revert anyone you want. Warning users for unconstructive editing is better left to a more experienced user - i.e. someone with over 200 mainspace edits. Finally, please refrain from masquerading an administrator or making personal attacks; you could get blocked from editing. Thank you, — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 06:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with above... I already wanted you about this on my talk page. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 13:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 21:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.[edit]

I have a question... Are you indeed using multiple accounts? If so, can you please list off any alternative accounts you may own? I'm asking because there's something unusual about the block notice above. I don't see any evidence you are socking. And if you are indeed a sock puppet, your original account isn't named, so... Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 00:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up; You are allowed to edit this page unless an administrator decides to revoke that privilege. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Συντάκτης (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a mistake and I am sorry. I understand what I did. I put an administrator icon on my user and talk page (when I was not), and did not remain calm. Instead, I did personal attacks with out thinking of what I may have done wrong. I am sorry for doing that. If I'm unblocked I will try to a better editor. Συντάκτης (talk) 02:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not address the actual reason for your block, as below. Kuru (talk) 00:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just to let you know, you aren't quite blocked for the admin icon/person attack... You're blocked because an administrator thinks you are a sock puppet. However, me and another user are also questioning your block at this talk page section. Feel free to check it out. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note from blocking admin: Συντάκτης, you (the person, not this account) were blocked at the time that this account was created, so you will likely need to address the block evasion before any unblock will be considered here. For privacy reasons, you are not required to discuss the prior block publicly here, so you may want to take advantage of the Unblock Ticket Request System where a limited number of admins will have access to your appeal, and where an uninvolved CheckUser can double check my results. —DoRD (talk) 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]