User talk:राजलेखम
March 2019[edit]
Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Uttar Pradesh appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
May 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Suhaldev without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 02:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- I had removed a term Bhar Rajput. Bhars are not Rajput they are even not in General category. Bhar is a distinct caste. If it was written Bhar,Rajput like this then no problem. Because today Rajput is a caste and bhar is a separate caste so comma is must if you write bhar and Rajput. But yes if there is any authentic source available for Bhar as a Rajput then add citation according to law of wikipedia. Yes wikipedia is not a play ground but some people use it to give false information or to spread false propaganda it can not be tolerated. Even villages of Awadh are divided on caste basis such as Rajput Tola, Baabhan Tola, Bhar Tola,Mahaar Tola and so on if Bhars are Rajput then why there is separate Mohalla or Tola for them in villages. So don,t provide false information. राजलेखम (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- We stick to the cited source: that's why the words "Bhar Rajput" are in quotes. utcursch | talk 12:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
No you are not because there is not any citation symbol over Bhar Rajput. Remember it is a digital era any one can go to Digital library of India or archive.org and search who it what? And Who is not But this is not necessary for people like me who know the ground reality so do,t fool people. according to law of Wikipedia only authenticated sources can be applied but i know there is no such authenticated source that can claim clearly Bhar as a Rajput. Also according to report of Mandal Commission Rajputs are clearly mentioned as general category while Bhars were in OBC category but today in Uttar pradesh Yogi adityanath gave them SC reservation. राजलेखम (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
So keep commenting and keep playing on Wikipedia. Your Wikipedia dance cannot change the truth. I know some english morons have written many thing about Rajput origin it is not a easy task for a non hindu and foreigner to understand complex Hindu caste system ,but it is the fact in India that blood purity can,t be underestimated and it was a very big issue in past time. So if any Rajput king had concubines of other community then first of all their child could not be a pure rajput but a half Rajput and they are known Today as Paaswaan or Paasi or Kotwaal. But if any one want to become a fake rajput on the basis of their sturdy foolishness then please keep trying to pierce the sky. राजलेखम (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
May 2021[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Janjua. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2023[edit]
Hello! I'm Re Packer&Tracker. Your recent edit(s) to the page Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 16:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Baruwar (Rajput clan) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baruwar (Rajput clan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.