Jump to content

User talk:1.43.24.22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Liz Mullinar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. --Serols (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to David Battie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ----Rdp060707|talk 06:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to David Battie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ----Rdp060707|talk 06:46, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Princepratap1234. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mable Burton Ringling, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Princepratap1234 (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Replacing the Daily Mail with a reprint of the Daily Mail is the same source. If you don't have a respected and reliable source for the claim, stop trying to put it in. David Gerard (talk) 08:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Guide for sources[edit]

In case it can help, WP:RSP or WP:RSN and its archives may be useful to determine if a source is acceptable. Also, in the case of biographies of living people, WP:BLPRS is the policy. —PaleoNeonate06:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]