User talk:100michel1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 100michel1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Esteghlal F.C. did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 01:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Esteghlal F.C.[edit]

Please give a valid reason for content and citation removal in the wp:edit summary. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 01:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, I am now putting sources in my content 100michel1 (talk) 10:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100michel1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is the reason for my blocking? I didn't do anything wrong and I didn't enter content without source, why are you blocking me? Why do you make me have to use another account to defend my right? Please unblock because I didn't do anything wrong

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

100michel1 (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)I am not a spare account, please unblock me --jpgordon[reply]

I am not a multi account[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100michel1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Believe me, I am not a malicious user and I don't know why I was blocked. I only expanded the articles and even the @Adakiko said on the discussion page of the article that users should expand this article, and I expanded it, but a user lied about me. An administrator hit me and blocked me without letting me defend myself. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You admitted in your previous request that you created another account. I admit I don't know how to get unblocked from sockpuppetry (other than, come clean about all your accounts, even the ones we don't know about, and tell us which one, and only one, you will use from now until the end of time), but I do know more about how not to get unblocked, and freely disclosing you created another account is definitely high on that list. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

100michel1 (talk) 06:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used the other account to defend myself and I did not create it for vandalism. I promise that such misunderstanding will not happen again, please remove the obstructionDaniel Case

I am not a multi account[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100michel1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a malicious user, believe me, my content is useful and I was blocked due to a misunderstanding. Also, if I made another account, it was for self-defense and I did not do any sabotage with it. I promise that such a mistake will not happen again, please unblock it

Decline reason:

WP:SO is your only chance, and will require a completely different approach than the one you are taking here. That and six months with zero edits. Yamla (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

100michel1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I promise to consult before editing, but believe me, my edits are not a problem, but with this situation, I promise to consult first, please unblock me, please 100michel1 (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet. Also, you're ignoring what we tell you. After six months of no sock puppetry or block evasion, make an unblock request from your original account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.