User talk:103.59.38.34

Always cite reliable published sources

Hello, I'm AzfarShams. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Equipment of the Bangladesh Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --AzfarShams (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Equipment of the Bangladesh Army, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Equipment of the Bangladesh Army repeatedly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SRS 00 t@lk, 03:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Do not edit war

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Equipment of the Bangladesh Army. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:17, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:103.59.38.34 reported by User:Worldbruce (Result: ). Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Number-changing vandalism; no sources. Per a complaint at WP:AN3 about Equipment of the Bangladesh Army. EdJohnston (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello, I'm Mkcaldwell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aurélien Tchouaméni have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mkcaldwell (talk) 19:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---