User talk:109.181.191.7

April 2018

Hello, I'm UnsungKing123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bet Lynch have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. UnsungKing123 (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bet Lynch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 19:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amanda Holden, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Andrew Scarborough. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Continued BLP violations, specifically in Sally Bretton with an unsourced (disputed, discussed on talk page) change shortly before being blocked, 20:07, 1 May 2018, and again shortly after the block was lifted, 23:31, 5 May 2018. Adding unreferenced info to Claire Skinner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Jo Enright (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Sharlene Whyte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Ronz (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Persephone Swales-Dawson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Ronz (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 18:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

---