Jump to content

User talk:173.71.73.34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Oklahoma City bombing—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 01:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adakiko. How did the edit not "appear" constructive? I would posit the contrary - the citing of opinions from another page does not constitute fact. Hence the edits. Can you tell me if the parts that were removed are fact or fiction. The citing simply links to a person's opinion on a random website. Please demonstrate to me that those are facts. If you cannot, then why do you pretend they are facts? If you wish to have a database full of nonsensical, biased opinions; then feel free to stonewall unbiased, objective, outside fixes. If you wish to maintain a questionable, historic database where opinions are cast as true facts, then continue continue to block any outside thought. I just hope you can answer the question - prove that it's fact and not a very subjective opinion on some random webpage. I can find lots of websites that say the contrary. In fact, I can make a website right now, and post my friend's opinion quote (or my own quote). That does not mean that it should live as fact in the town square. In fact, the facts point to the exact opposite. Why would "white supremacists" target and kill mostly white people. Do you think any acts that these 2 people did had anything to do with skin color? No - they simply HATED government and the FBI (the mostly WHITE government). How on God's green earth do you make the leap of logic to conclude that they are "white supremacists." That is just pure delusion. Your "theory" is not correct. And it's sad you think it's a 'fact.' Again, please show me how this is a fact. You can't. I'm not sure why you protect this nonsense. It's so sad. 173.71.73.34 (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion belongs on the talk page. Please continue the discussion on talk:Oklahoma City bombing#Opinion pieces are not valid sources. Adakiko (talk) 21:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please login to your Wikipedia account and don't edit while logged out from an IP address. See policy on editing while logged out. Adakiko (talk) 21:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.