User talk:174.169.32.210

April 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Deborah Chow—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2023

Hello, I'm M88835. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M88835 (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deborah Chow. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was not vandalism. The quote I removed is the opinion of one person and does not contribute to the merit or factual accuracy of the biography. The tense is also incorrect in the sentence I fixed. 174.169.32.210 (talk) 01:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Deborah Chow, you may be blocked from editing. -- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 01:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My most recent edit was not disruptive. I removed a quote that did not contribute to the merit or accuracy of the subjects biography and corrected the tense of a past event. What is disruptive about that? 174.169.32.210 (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.169.32.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was banned for trying to make a constructive edit. I had made previous inaccurate edits, so bots were filtering out all of my edits. I made a constructive edit and a bot automatically reverted it. I undid this revision and was banned for disruptive edits. I was not being disruptive, and you can review my most recent edit to see why. 174.169.32.210 (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no indication that this IP address is or ever has been blocked, so therefore I can't unblock you since there is no block.

Although, granted, from your history on Deborah Chow I would have certainly considered blocking you. So, if you decided to essentially self-block, that wasn't a bad thing, really. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.