Jump to content

User talk:1912Gogo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm SemiHypercube. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zamzam Well have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. SemiHypercube (talk) 19:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zamzam Well. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SemiHypercube (talk) 20:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Zamzam Well shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 20:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zamzam Well, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 02:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize that the internet is interrupted so I could not fix it[edit]

I apologize that the internet is interrupted so I could not fix it 1912Gogo (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:1912Gogo reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: ). Thank you. Doug Weller talk 06:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 13:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]