User talk:194.230.158.180

April 2022

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Team Hell No—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that not only you deleted all the links to public libraries, but you also deleted video material about the author. That means that you practically eliminated all the proof that that author's work has been accepted beyond publications themselves. If not mentioning public libraries and video material which allows to judge the author's work, then you need to demonstrate the alternative, i.e. in which format do you think it should be presented. Otherwise by erasing all the proof of acceptance of that author's work, which is actually absolutely objective, what is being left? How do you suggest a list of libraries is being added, in the text? It is not a list of shops and by no means it is any marketing, it is a demonstration of validity of the author's work, if anything. Any suggestions?

MM 194.230.158.180 (talk) 00:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Oleg Haslavsky

The ISBN links will send the reader to a list of places the books can be found, so it is not necessary to add them again. ... discospinster _talk 00:08, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that not only you deleted all the links to public libraries, but you also deleted video material about the author. That means that you practically eliminated all the proof that that author's work has been accepted beyond publications themselves. If not mentioning public libraries and video material which allows to judge the author's work, then you need to demonstrate the alternative, i.e. in which format do you think it should be presented. Otherwise by erasing all the proof of acceptance of that author's work, which is actually absolutely objective, what is being left? How do you suggest a list of libraries is being added, in the text? It is not a list of shops and by no means it is any marketing, it is a demonstration of validity of the author's work, if anything. Any suggestions?

And no, just searching for ISBN on google does not really give the information about libraries, may be one or two if at all, it depends when they updated their entries. And if anyone wants to read or take a look, how else one communicates this information?

Erasing videos and links to conference proceedings - how can that be good? No sense at all.

MM 194.230.158.180 (talk) 00:17, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The ISBN links in the article will take the reader to a list, they don't have to Google it. ... discospinster _talk 01:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.