User talk:198.161.86.10

August 2017

Hello, I'm Kbseah. An edit that you recently made to List of people from Lethbridge seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Kbseah (talk) 21:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slavery in Canada. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop making this edit. The lede is clear that the article is discussing slavery in the area that now forms Canada, not just slavery in Canada after Confederation. Per WP:BRD it is up to you to discuss contested edits on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Slavery in Canada. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You appear to have made this edit three times now, so I suggest that you read WP:EW also. Meters (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Slavery in Canada. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 18:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Hello, you're the only one who has violated Wikipedia's policy - Notably Edit warring and bullying. Thank you.[reply]

October 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Slavery in Canada.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

198.161.86.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User: Meters never once attempted to resolve the dispute, he simply dictated I must abide by his edits. He never asked me why I changed things only that he is correct and I am not. He never checked the relevance of the information, he never checked the accuracy, or anything else simply demanded I do as he says or else. He reported me because I wouldn't be a good boy and follow his orders. The information I added is relevant and necessary for the page and I do explain this in my report regarding him. Had he attempted to even ask why I was adding the one detail I would've explained to him in full but he didn't simply edit warred then reported me. 198.161.86.10 (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an unblock request. You need to address your actions, not those of another person. And you need to demonstrate you understand WP:EW and what you did wrong. Yamla (talk) 20:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you continue to evade your block, as you did at using User:70.75.213.18, your block will be reset.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page Aphantasia appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Dictionary of Neurological Signs source currently being cited only mentions a "lack of visual imagery". Lord Belbury (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.