User talk:1981willy

If you continue to upload images claiming you created them yourself when you did not, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Even with public domain images, this is not acceptable. Sources should be clearly identified, and why they're in the public domain made clear. Regards Wily D 18:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tags[edit]

Let me know if you need some help with these; as the post above says, there seem to be some problems with your image uploads. --John 18:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this image is a NASA image, for instance it's here: [1] in a public release catalogue of images. It should be tagged appropriately, compare with entries in Category:NASA images. The Vega one could be replaced by a higher res version anyhow, so there's not much sense in keeping it. Wily D 18:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the images you uploaded that violated someone's copyright are now deleted - please don't do that again. I've tagged the NASA images appropriately, and uploaded higher resolution versions to boot. In the future, if you're unsure of what to do ... ask! Wily D 20:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lvbp.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lvbp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Okliga.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Okliga.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:REAL 1.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:REAL 1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BARCELONA 1.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:BARCELONA 1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 19:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Eruption 1954 Kilauea Volcano.jpg[edit]

File:Eruption 1954 Kilauea Volcano.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Eruption 1954 Kilauea Volcano.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Eruption 1954 Kilauea Volcano.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]