Jump to content

User talk:199.106.103.57

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to San Diego, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --MelanieN (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bal Thackeray without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sitush (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Bal Thackeray

[edit]

Why is the Deccan Chronicle figure of 500,000 at Bal Thackeray a "prejudiced opinion", as you claim in your edit summary? And did you actually read the source that said "nearly 2 million"? It most definitely does not say it was 2 million. I think that if you wish to pursue this then you'll need to open a discussion at Talk:Bal Thackeray. - Sitush (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced the link that you say was not working wherever it is that you are. Now please do not revert that information again without discussion. The article is prone to "fanboy"-type contributions and has only recently come off semi-protection. If you edit war then it is likely that you will be bloxked from contributing. Much better to discuss any remaining concerns that you may have on the talk page, don't you think? - Sitush (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, how did you come to the conclusion that the Deccan Chronicle source was a "prejudiced opinion" if you could not even see it? - Sitush (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sitush,
Anyone who witnessed the event in person or otherwise can tell that the crowd was in millions, infact 2 million is a conservative estimate ( could be 4 million or more if we inlclude ppl who came out from Bandra west to Dadar )  ; 500,000 is ridiculous. It smells prejudice. Infact the most conservative estimate of the Mumbai police is 2 million.
BTW even in your link the number mentioned is 1 million ( no 500 k) .
bhushan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.106.103.57 (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2012

Your recent editing history at Bal Thackeray shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 22:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 220 of Borg. Your recent edit to the page List of aftershocks of April 2015 Nepal earthquake appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 220 of Borg 21:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digistar (October 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 199.106.103.57! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Digistar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digistar

[edit]

Hello, 199.106.103.57. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digistar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]