User talk:199.106.103.57

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This host, sp7.qualcomm.com (199.106.103.57), is registered to Qualcomm and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to San Diego, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --MelanieN (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bal Thackeray without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sitush (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Bal Thackeray

Why is the Deccan Chronicle figure of 500,000 at Bal Thackeray a "prejudiced opinion", as you claim in your edit summary? And did you actually read the source that said "nearly 2 million"? It most definitely does not say it was 2 million. I think that if you wish to pursue this then you'll need to open a discussion at Talk:Bal Thackeray. - Sitush (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced the link that you say was not working wherever it is that you are. Now please do not revert that information again without discussion. The article is prone to "fanboy"-type contributions and has only recently come off semi-protection. If you edit war then it is likely that you will be bloxked from contributing. Much better to discuss any remaining concerns that you may have on the talk page, don't you think? - Sitush (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, how did you come to the conclusion that the Deccan Chronicle source was a "prejudiced opinion" if you could not even see it? - Sitush (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sitush,

Anyone who witnessed the event in person or otherwise can tell that the crowd was in millions, infact 2 million is a conservative estimate ( could be 4 million or more if we inlclude ppl who came out from Bandra west to Dadar ) ; 500,000 is ridiculous. It smells prejudice. Infact the most conservative estimate of the Mumbai police is 2 million.

BTW even in your link the number mentioned is 1 million ( no 500 k) .

bhushan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.106.103.57 (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2012‎

Your recent editing history at Bal Thackeray shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 22:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015

Hello, I'm 220 of Borg. Your recent edit to the page List of aftershocks of April 2015 Nepal earthquake appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 21:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digistar (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digistar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digistar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 199.106.103.57! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Digistar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Digistar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digistar

Hello, 199.106.103.57. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digistar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.